[HBR] Another Receiver Project -- HBR-4, Part 23
waltah at earthlink.net
waltah at earthlink.net
Sun Dec 12 22:05:11 EST 2004
'Learning ... something ... I think ...'
The high pass filter idea didn't work, but adjusting the premixer and
mixer balance made all the various spurs tolerably small. I still
haven't gone to work on the crystal oscillator.
Time for serious testing of dynamic range. I spent about a week
thinking about theory and reading about issues. Then I did the
tests at various signal levels to get a handle on receiver issues vs.
test setup issues. I got good consistent results at about IFDR =
78 db. That's better than a whole lot of vacuum tube receivers, not
quite as good as the R-390A, and certainly not what I wanted or
even expected.
Back to head scratching.
I have a hard time believing that the problem is in the mixer; the
6JH8 is linear for deflection plate inputs to about 40 volts peak-to-
peak. I don't think the 6ES8 RF stage should be that much worse;
while it doesn't have so great a range as the mixer, it's way up
there as RF stage tubes go, and the sections are in push pull, so
second-order distortion should be mostly cancelled out. Plus
signals are smaller there.
That doesn't leave much. The most obvious candidate is those
wonderful FT-101E tunable front end coils: cup-and-core
construction, very high Q, but the cores are very small -- under
6mm diameter; could saturation be the issue? The FT-101's IFDR
was *40* db; coils that would have limited the range to ~80 db
would have been adequate and then some.
With a good spectrum analyzer the answer would come pretty
easily -- at least to the level of what stage the problem shows up
in. I don't have that, but another approach would be using a signal
generator to measure the IFDR and third order intercept (sort of the
maximum power level that can be handled) at each stage. I may
not have a powerful enough sig gen to do that either, but it's worth
a try.
Maybe at the mixer input. Sensitivity there is probably around 10
uV and the signal generators go over 100,000 uV -- there's 80 db,
so it should be close at worst.
Yet another way -- and confirmation of the diagnosis if the signal
generator test suggests the problem is between the RF and mixer
stages -- is a temporary external tuned circuit with a more robust
coil. That one's messy, due to the push-pull output of the RF
stage. Too soon to think about the 'fix' if this really is the problem.
Walt
KJ4KV
More information about the HBR
mailing list