[HBR] Another HBR Project -- Chapter 8
[email protected]
[email protected]
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 05:15:54 -0400
Subtitled ... "And it looked so easy ..."
Yesterday I wired the 100 kcs calibration oscillator. There are
several things to be said about this:
1. It was probably unnecessary for a reasonably stable receiver
that's only going to be calibrated every 50 kcs or so and that already
has a marker at 3500 kcs courtesy of the 1750 kcs 2nd oscillator.
2. It *seemed* really easy ... after all, I was copying the circuit
'verbatum' from another set, and,
3. It turned into a real can of worms, because ...
4. It was a dumb idea trying to put it in the same envelope (other half
of a 6U8) as the 85 kcs BFO.
It wasn't more than the usual amount of trouble getting the oscillator
to work -- there are a lot of parts and (Walt's third rule of
homebrewing) I seem to wire about 1/4 of all parts wrong the first
time. But then ... beat notes every few kcs (like, less 5) all up and
down the dial, and close enough to the same strength that picking
the right ones is impossible. Gosh ... I sure didn't expect that from
a 100 kcs crystal. Same thing happened with another crystal, too --
and both of them believed to be good.
Took me a while to figure out, but the problem was that the 85 kcs
BFO was modulating the 100 kcs calibration oscillator. So the
output frequencies of the latter are every multiple of the common
divisor -- since the two frequencies aren't precise, there isn't actually
an exact common divisor so there are an infinite number of
frequencies but fortunately you can't hear all of them. I spent half an
hour looking for oddball coupling mechanisms but finally decided that
there was (a) too much stuff too close together, since both
oscillators are in the same tube, and (b) way too much BFO voltage
floating around. How much is too much? Try 120 volts p-p on the
plate of the oscillator tube! Since the calibrator is the pentode half
of a 6U8 and the BFO is the triode, coupling is unavoidable. And
that's with just enough BFO plate voltage to get good injection.
The reason the BFO operates that way is that I stole the command
set circuit along with the BFO coil. "It seemed like a good idea at
the time" but the command sets run a high-output oscillator very
loosely coupled to the detector so they get a good waveform -- no
spurious signals. I need to put the BFO into the cathode circuit of a
plate detector -- that's a low impedance circuit. And getting 6V p-p
at the detector cathode with loose coupling requires 120V p-p on the
BFO plate. Increasing the coupling to get a greater fraction of the
plate signal killed the oscillator.
Obvious answer -- redesign the BFO to deliver output at a lower
impedance and voltage -- and BTW, to minimize coupling within the
6U8, why not put the plate at RF ground? In other words use a
tickler to feed back from the cathode to the grid circuit. That took
most of a day of thrashing about because I had to go into the
oscillator coil assembly, reverse the connections to one of the coils
and replace the internal cap with an external one so I could get the
frequency right. And of course there's Rule 3.
But it worked. I moved the tuned winding from the oscillator plate to
the grid and the tickler from the grid to the cathode. The largest
signal is now 20 volts p-p on the grid and the 6 volt cathode signal
can be coupled through a large cap to the detector cathode. The
(cathode) output waveform is pretty poor, but the voltage is low
enough that pickup of harmonics in other parts of the receiver
shouldn't be a problem.
With this change modulation of the 100 kcs calibrator signal by the
BFO is no longer visible and although with the antenna disconnected
you can hear lots of beat notes, the 'real' ones are S-8 or so and the
others barely move the needle. Not great, but good enough.
The change solved a second problem as well. The detector circuit
I'm using is a plate detector with the BFO injected on the cathode for
SSB/CW. But for AM, the cathode should be bypassed to ground --
'plate detector,' right? Turning the BFO off by shorting its cathode to
ground (shorting the tickler winding) turns the coupling cap into the
needed bypass for the detector and for the first time in my use of that
detector circuit, the output volume is the same on AM as on SSB.
The tube is protected by the large plate resistor.
Other progress -- I extracted the 3 mmf N750 temp compensating
cap from the command receiver that donated the coil sockets and
installed it on the 1WHBR; it helps but it's not enough. Well, it
wasn't enough in the command receiver, either ... they generally are
much improved if you add a second cap, and in fact the late-
manufacture ARC-5 receivers have two caps factory installed. (Look
for an 'S' inside a circle stamped next to the tuning knob; the second
cap is on the coil socket inside the tuning cap shield.) I'll either add
a second one or go to 10 mmf N750.
As Bart Simpson would say ... The deep fat fryer is not a toy. I will
not call her Mrs. Dumbface. And I will *never again* put two
oscillators at nearly the same frequency in the same envelope.
Still have to hook up the STDBY switch, finish the alignment of the
80 meter coils and wind some for another band or two. Also do the
basic performance measurements. Another data point on
sensitivity: in the evening it picks up 75 meter phone signals with no
antenna.
Walt
KJ4KV