[HBR] HBR2K Chapter 6 -- The story resumes
[email protected]
[email protected]
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 23:30:09 -0500
Synopsis: In earlier chapters (January - August '01) I set out the
goal of updating the Crosby receiver idea from a 1950 concept to
about the 1970's, while keeping it a set that the moderately skilled
home constructor could hope to duplicate.
I began trying to homebrew a 'hollow state' receiver based on front
end and other parts from an FT-101E. This approach seemed to
offer a chance to build a receiver better than anything available on the
ham market in the 60's. The FT-101 not only has much usable sheet
metal (everything important but the chassis plate and front panel) and
a nice cabinet, but nearly all of the miscellaneous parts -- switches,
an S-Meter, a box in which to build the power supply, and most of
the hardware to put the thing together. Many of the parts --
particularly the permiability tuned front end, the VFO mechanicals,
the tuning cap and filters -- are equal or even superior to anything
used in tube ham gear, yeah, even Collins, in my opinion.
(Powdered iron cup-and-core front end coils -- who else did that?)
However the FT-101 and other gear of the 70's suffered from the
various drawbacks of transistors, particularly in strong signal
handling. And because 60's manufacturers were already struggling,
none of the ham tube equipment was built with the best of the 60's
tubes and circuits.
It ought to be possible to have the best of all worlds, with FT-101
parts sets in the $100+/- range it wouldn't be too expensive, and
gosh -- it shouldn't even be that hard.
Should it?
The truth began to emerge in Chapters 1-5, posted as I got serious
about the project. I started as usual, at the audio stages, and got
back as far as the second mixer before other life-things got in the
way. By that time I was dealing with a couple of serious problems.
One was that I had somehow overlooked the fact that the FT-101
crystal filters need to see about 1200 ohms on both ends. I tried
various simple measures but what would you expect, from simple
measures? Yesterday I did it right, added a cathode follower to drive
the filter at the proper impedence, and changed the 1st IF tube grid
resistor to 1200 ohms. End of problem.
This may not cost an extra envelope because I used the triode half of
a 6KE8 (6U8 with a better pentode) for the C.F. The pentode half
can be used for the 100 kcs calibrator leaving an empty socket in the
planned location. Total 13 tubes.
One resolve during my 16-month break was to replace my highly
modified IF transformers with units as close as possible to junkbox
stock command set units. That turned out to be simpler than
expected; the 1415 kcs units from the 3-6 Mcs receivers require only
changing the internal fixed caps to work fine at 3180 kcs. (18 mmf
primary and 22 mmf secondary for the first two, 18 mmf for the
secondary on the third, replacing 180 mmf.) Added bonus -- the last
IFT has to be tapped because of the detector circuit and the
command set output unit is already so. I wound up using tapped
transformers for all stages (higher Q and lower gain) but that was
probably unnecessary and doing it again, I would not.
The 2830 kcs units from 6-9.1 Mcs receivers seem a more natural fit,
but the more plentiful SCR-274N equipment used single tuned air
core IFTs in this receiver.
I had had oscillation in the IF stages. Changing the filter
connections and improving grounding made things much better, even
with the higher gain of the command set IFTs. But ... the S-meter
didn't act right. It jumped around when I tuned the GDO across
3180 kcs but didn't show any real increase. Backtracking the
problem, the AGC voltage was behaving correctly, but the 2nd IF
stage voltages (the S-meter is connected between the screen and
cathode) were not.
????!?!
For no particular reason I realigned the IF's and got a clue: when the
set was turned on, a nice clean whistle went through the filter
passband and disappeared. I went looking for a steady state
oscillation but found nothing -- after a minute of warmup, it was gone.
Humm ... could the bizzare S-Meter behavior be the result of a forced
oscillation that shifted the tube operating point to largely counter the
effect of the AGC? Weird ...
It could only be in the 2nd IF because the 1st IF has a 1200 ohm grid
resistor. On a hunch I reversed the 3rd IFT coil connections, placing
the IF tube plate on the small end of the tapped winding rather than
the big one -- 1/3 of the total impedence rather than 2/3. Bingo!
The change also reversed the phase of the signal to the detector
relative to the earlier stages. If the detector was in the feedback path
(it didn't seem to be, but ...), that could have been the true fix.
The 6EH7 (12,000 umhos transconductance) may be overkill, gain-
wise, but it has such amazing crossmodulation characteristics that
it's the clear choice for serious receiver design.
The tube was designed for TV IF service. At -6.5 volts on the grid it
requires 100 mv of signal to produce 1% crossmod. At -20 volts,
(near cutoff) it will handle half a volt of signal at 1% crossmod. The
nine-pin socket makes it a difficult retrofit in most ham sets but I've
done it a few times (usually as an RF stage, sometimes also as the
first IF) and it makes a huge difference in some sets in which signals
are clean on an empty band and 'muddy' sounding on 80m in the
evening. Of course on some sets the main problem is the mixer(s).
Anyhow the HBR2K is wired back as far as the output of the second
mixer and (seemingly) all working -- I'm listening to an HF broadcast
station on a clip lead connected to the second mixer grid. Thank
God for World Harvest Radio, well, 'so to speak.' It's easy to hear,
and I expect I can find the frequencies on the web. Yeah, gain isn't
going to be a problem.
Next thing is a couple of clean-up operations; I foolishly wired the five
position function switch of the FT-101 (LSB-USB-TUNE-AM-CW) for
LSB-USB-CW-AM, leaving an unused position. I need to rewire it for
LSB-USB-CW-AM 2kcs-AM 4kcs. At an early stage I made some
dumb changes in one of the chassis shield partitions; I have to
replace that before I can do any of earlier stages.
Then wiring the tunable first IF. This is a design change from the FT-
101, which used a bandpass first IF.
Then the RF stages and first mixer. Because of the close quarters
that's going to be a challenge. I'm transplanting the FT-101
bandswitch, coils, crystal socket and trimmer boards as nearly intact
as possible but there are still a whole lot of connections. And again
I have to convert an oscillator from solid state to hollow -- the first
oscillator, which selects the band.
Mixers, at least, are rarely unstable. I hate that stuff.
Walt Hutchens
KJ4KV