[HBR] Small 100Khz IF transformers
Bob Duckworth, WB4MNF
[email protected]
Sun, 05 May 2002 07:20:47 -0400
Kees-
Have you given any thought to using two of these 262 coils?
Place the windings in series on each and wind yourself a link
coil on each, between the windings. Use this link coil as your
coupling between the two tuned circuits. If you experiment a
bit, you can likely stick a cap across the link to vary bandwidth.
I've not built this, just a thought. I get them sometimes
when it's still early in the AM and I've just had my morning coffee :-)
73,
-bob
wb4mnf
Sandy and Kees Talen wrote:
> Just got through testing a few JW Miller 15-H, K-TRAN, 262Khz
> IF transformers. These are the small 3/4" square units (same
> physical size as used on the HBR-11/12/13). These were
> originally designed for 6BE6 and 6BA6 IF tubes.
>
> Coil inductance actually goes from about 2mH to 6mH which really
> surprises me that it will go that high. They are set at approx 3.5mH
> for the 262Khz frequency. The resonating capacitor integtated into
> the base ranges from 80-95pf.
>
> The coils are very densely wound (something I can't do yet with the
> coil winder) using approx 37 feet of #40 wire (not bifilar .....which
> surprises me a little). There is no room to add windings to the
> diameter of the coil (will contact the powdered iron cup), but there is
> a possibility of adding additional turns to the ends of the coil. The
> cup provides higher permeability and self shielding, something the
> JW Miller #1710 and #1709 don't have, requiring a flexible powdered
> iron material inside the can.
>
> At 95% of the maximum inductance (should be lower to allow tuning
> room) the coil "Q" is "74" which is very close to what the 100Khz
> JW miller IFs measure.
>
> Calculations show that a 430pf padder added to the 80-95pf internal
> capacitor will bring it to 100Khz. This is more capacitance than
> I would normally add as additional padder, however the starting
> point is 80-95pf. This brings the total to approx 520pf.....that's high.
> The JW Miller 100Khz IFs use 333pf. Need to make some more
> "Q" compares but my JW Miller #1710 is about useless (patched
> broken wires at the coil 3 times) due to the multiple times removing
> it from the can, unsoldering wires, etc.
>
> All the above said, the Spectrum Analyzer does not lie (the real circuit
> application would be better) and at -6dB, the BW is 3.8Khz and the
> -20dB BW is 19.2Khz ....really pretty good. The JW Miller #1710 is
> measured at 3.5Khz and 15Khz. You can add another IF stage and
> put two IFs in series (HBR-13). The overall insertion loss is greater
> than the #1710 but .....close enough.
>
> Since the #1710 and #1709 transformers are "unobtanium", these
> JW Miller 15-H IFs should be more readily available (used in many
> car radios) and ought to work ....and they have the cool JW Miller
> label just like the #1710 and #1709.
>
> 73s Kees K5BCQ
>
>
> ************************************
> Visit the HBR Receiver Web Site with over 100 pictures of receivers and
> construction notes...... via http://www.qsl.net/k5bcq/
>
> Retrieve reflector archived data via http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hbr
>
>
>
>