[Hammarlund] HQ-180A 60 KHz IF Problem - Suggestions?

Bob kb8tq kb8tq at n1k.org
Wed Feb 2 21:26:53 EST 2022


Hi

Ummm ….. errrr …. 1 ppm at 60 KHz would be 0.06 Hz. 1x10^-8
would be 0.0006 Hz. If the IF is within 6 Hz, that’s overkill. 6 / 60,000 = 
1/10,000 = 1x10^-4  …

Your Beckman EPUT meter ( or an LM frequency meter) would be way
more that adequate to be sure things are close. 

Bob

> On Feb 2, 2022, at 8:22 PM, jthorusen at centcoast.com wrote:
> 
> Hi Steve!
> 
>   Stop The Presses!!
> 
>   Before you get into this problem too deeply, I should bring to your 
> attention a gotcha that has bitten me before.   ...And that is.... can you 
> trust your test equipment?   Do you have a known good frequency counter (1 
> part in 10^8 accuracy) that you can measure your generator with to make sure 
> you are putting out 60 KHz and not something else?   Have you looked at your 
> generator output with a spectrum analyzer to be sure that you are putting 
> out a reasonably pure sine wave and not something that has spurs or 
> harmonics?   Are you using the absolute minimum of injected signal to ensure 
> that you are not generating spurious responses due to signal overload? 
> Have you isolated the 60 KHz IF strip by pulling the second converter (V5) 
> to ensure there are no spurs getting into the 60 KHz IF along with your 
> alignment signal?
> 
>   I don't have an HQ-180, but I do have an HQ-170, and I don't recall any 
> particular difficulties aligning it to 60 KHz., although it has been some 
> time since I had it on the bench.   I could see one or perhaps two tuned 
> circuits having problems, but all six, and all with an error in the same 
> direction?   The probability of that happening is almost vanishingly small. 
> I would look for a commonality in all of your measurements and that would 
> seem to point to a systematic error, i.e. test equipment or procedure.
> 
> Good Luck,
> Jim T.
> KB6GM
> www.centcoast.com
> jthorusen at centcoast.com
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steven Reed" <reedsteve59 at gmail.com>
> To: <Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2022 14:24
> Subject: Re: [Hammarlund] HQ-180A 60 KHz IF Problem - Suggestions?
> 
> 
> Bob,  it's not what I wanted to hear, but in all honesty I believe you're 
> over the target.  In thinking about this some more -- while on one hand it 
> is very rare for multiple components to fail, it's probably not so rare for 
> multiple components to (as you've pointed out) drift out of spec due to age 
> and environmental issues.  I think the only rational option at this point is 
> to recap everything in that IF section, including the switch.  I've got a 
> parts HQ-180A as well, in case any of the IF coils have issues.  I'll 
> probably do the switch first because the work is far less invasive, but if 
> that doesn't fix the problem then the transformers come out.
> 
> Steve.
> 
> On 2/2/22, 2:55 PM, "Bob kb8tq" <kb8tq at n1k.org> wrote:
> 
>    Hi
> 
>    Regardless of how you do an alignment (which *can* be tricky. Loading
>    resistors / shorting this or that can be involved …) The IF response 
> should
>    peak in the right vicinity. There should not be some single individual 
> component
>    that can fail and move all the transformers 20% low. That’s just not how
>    this stuff works.
> 
>    Bob
> 
>> On Feb 2, 2022, at 1:57 PM, Steven Reed <reedsteve59 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> THANK YOU!  I would love to read through Mr. Lester's method.  In my 
> 180A, the caps are all the dipped silver micas (El Menco).  While not prone 
> to failure either, these capacitors have been generally regarded as unlikely 
> to fail, even after all these years.  In the end I'll probably end up 
> replacing them anyway -- but I can't entirely shake the notion that the 
> cause of the IF behavior I'm seeing lies elsewhere.  Either in something I'm 
> doing, the instructions I'm using, or some element -- somewhere in the 
> circuitry -- that's gone south and is affecting the entire 60 KHz IF chain.
>> 
>> Steve.
>> 
>> On 2/2/22, 11:43 AM, "Al Parker" <anchor at ec.rr.com> wrote:
>> 
>>   Hi all,
>>   Hammarlund realized, sometime in the production of the 170/180's, 
> that
>>   the manual instructions for the 50kc IF were wrong.  They didn't do 
> a
>>   very good job of making that known, but Frank Lester did put out 
> the
>>   correct method.  I have 5 or 6 pages of emails, etc., from that 
> period.
>>     Right now they are in .jpg's and later today I'll get them into 
> a.pdf
>>   file and fwd it to anyone interested.
>>   Also, as has been mentioned, many of the caps in the IF xfmrs are
>>   'bad'.  Many are molded into the base of the xfmrs, and have to be 
> dug
>>   out with a dremel tool, and replaced with dipped silver micas.
>>   I'll get those note on .pdf later this PM, have some other things
>>   needing attn b4 then.
>>   73,
>> 
>>   Al, W8UT
>>   www.boatanchors.org
>>   www.hammarlund.info
>> 
>>   "There is nothing -- absolutely nothing -- half so much
>>   worth doing as simply messing about in boats"
>>   Ratty, to Mole
>> 
>>   On 2/2/2022 12:39 PM, Steven Reed wrote:
>>> Thanks for the reply, Les.  I live in southern Arizona and the 
> HQ-180A has been sitting below my bench for over a year -- any moisture 
> would be long gone by now.  On the other hand, it could be REALLY dried out. 
> Interesting about the 7036 tubes -- I'll have to look into that.  This 
> HQ-180A is a keeper and getting good performance out of it is tops on the 
> list.
>>> 
>>> Steve.
>>> 
>>> On 2/2/22, 10:30 AM, "Les Locklear" <leslocklear at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>    One thing is certain, depending on how or where it was stored. 
> The coil forms will soak up moisture. Turn it on and let it burn in for a 
> week. A friend had a HQ-180A that he was repairing for a customer that 
> wouldn't stop drifting. He actually turned it on and left it alone for a 
> month. That solved the problem and it never returned.
>>> 
>>>    I have an early HQ-180 that the drift is almost not noticeable. 
> Only mods are solid stating the PS and some audio mods. A Hayseed cap kit. I 
> use 7036 for the Mixer tubes and no longer have to replace 6BE6's. They are 
> a taller tube, but computer rated, even better that the mil spec Jan 5750's.
>>> 
>>>    That might not be the issue you have but it couldn't hurt it to 
> let it run for awhile.
>>> 
>>>    Les
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    ----- Original Message -----
>>>    From: Steven Reed <reedsteve59 at gmail.com>
>>>    To: <Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net>
>>>    Sent: 2/2/2022 11:17:43 AM
>>>    Subject: Re: [Hammarlund] HQ-180A 60 KHz IF Problem - 
> Suggestions?
>>> 
> ________________________________________________________________________________
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    Excellent points, Bob.  And it's true that we sometimes get to 
> the point with these old boat anchors where you have to stop circling the 
> drain and just begin replacing parts.  I'm probably at that point -- the 
> behavior of the IF section is just too systemic to isolate.  I'll replace 
> the capacitors on the switch assembly first -- those are much more 
> accessible.
>>> 
>>>    Ran into a logically similar situation with a HRO-60:  I finally 
> threw in the diagnosis towel and started replacing parts in the affected 
> circuit.  It got fixed.  It's not very elegant of a technique, though.
>>> 
>>>    Unfortunately, I have no idea what the history of this HQ-180A is 
> or how it was stored.  It's cosmetically in pretty good shape so I don't 
> think it was tossed in the back of a hot barn somewhere.  It appears to be a 
> later production model, probably built around 1970, so that's a good 52 
> years old.  1970 doesn't seem so long ago until you put the math to it!
>>> 
>>>    Steve.
>>> 
>>>    On 2/2/22, 9:41 AM, "Bob kb8tq" <kb8tq at n1k.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>        Hi
>>> 
>>>        Coils *do* age. They are a mechanical gizmo and they can / do 
> shrink. It
>>>        is not surprising that a batch that all came off the coil 
> winder on the same
>>>        day and all lived in the same environment did pretty much the 
> same thing.
>>> 
>>>        Did the radio get stored out in a shed that routinely got 
> *really* hot in the
>>>        sun? Did that happen day after day for years?  Some radios do 
> get stored
>>>        that way. You just never quite know ….
>>> 
>>>        Again, this is only a guess. There is no way to be 100% 
> sure …..
>>> 
>>>        You could spend some “quality time” with a circuit analysis 
> program and
>>>        maybe work out the original circuit. If you have never done 
> that stuff before,
>>>        plan on spending more than a bit of time at it …..
>>> 
>>>        Bob
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 2, 2022, at 10:55 AM, Steven Reed <reedsteve59 at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the reply, Bob.  There are no padder caps and judging by 
> the soldering work in the IF section, no one has touched it since the radio 
> was built.  I have a parts donor that's from around the same timeframe and 
> pulled a 60 KHz IF can (they're all the same) to run some measurements.  The 
> capacitors are all El Menco dipped micas and measured correct on the LCR 
> meter (that's no guarantee of course).  The coil (at least in the one I 
> pulled) measured between 3.4 mH at one extreme, to 5.6 mH the other.  This 
> puts the "native" resonant frequency of the IF can between 74 KHz and 94 
> KHz.  However, Hammarlund's design switches various additional capacitances 
> in and out of the circuit by way of the bandwidth and sideband selectors. 
> Quite complex.  I've evaluated every capacitor and resistor on the switch 
> array and so far have found nothing out of spec.  I also cleaned and checked 
> the operation of that switch array under a magnifying glass.
>>>> 
>>>> Pulling all six IF transformers and recapping them is something that 
> can absolutely be done.  But I'm restraining myself until more is known -- I 
> have a hard time digesting the idea that all of those transformers have 
> simultaneously drifted.
>>>> 
>>>> Steve.
>>>> 
>>>> On 2/2/22, 8:36 AM, "Bob kb8tq" <kb8tq at n1k.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>  Hi
>>>> 
>>>>  A couple “simple” answers to why the drift:
>>>> 
>>>>  1) Somebody had a faulty signal generator and re-capped the IF 
> transformers.
>>>>  If you are lucky, they did it by adding padder caps that are easy 
> to remove.
>>>> 
>>>>  2) The coils have “tightened up” ( and thus increased in 
> inductance) as the radio
>>>>  has been through this or that combination of heat / cold / 
> humidity.
>>>> 
>>>>  3) The caps have all drifted due to the same sort of issue.
>>>> 
>>>>  Yes, there are other possibilities, but the solutions would still 
> fall into those three
>>>>  categories. The only practical fix (if there aren’t suspicious pad 
> caps) is to re-cap
>>>>  the transformers.
>>>> 
>>>>  Bob
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 2, 2022, at 10:28 AM, Steven Reed <reedsteve59 at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’ve been busy restoring a beautiful old HQ-180A.  Previous owners 
> have struggled with the IF of this radio and I localized and fixed the major 
> smoking gun:  V7’s cathode resistor had drifted from 68 ohms to over 400 
> ohms.  I’m now left with the aftermath of all the fiddling and prodding that’s 
> happened to the IF section over the years.  The problem I’m now facing is 
> that the 60 KHz IF section isn’t resonant at 60 KHz and won’t align 
> correctly – I can’t find a peak at 60 KHz in any of the IF transformers (T6 
> through T11).  The radio is correctly set according to the manual for this 
> procedure.  However, if I vary the signal generator some, the transformers 
> will find strong peaks around 54 – 56 KHz.  Been through a lot of steps 
> trying to isolate this but keep coming up empty.  The entire 60 KHz IF chain 
> appears to be affected – injecting signals further down the line produces 
> nothing different.  What would drive the resonant frequency of the ENTIRE 60 
> KHz IF chain down like this?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 73 – Steve, KW4H
>>>>> 
>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>> Hammarlund mailing list
>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hammarlund
>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>> Post: mailto:Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net
>>>>> 
>>>>> List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
>>>>> ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>> 
>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>> Hammarlund mailing list
>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hammarlund
>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>> Post: mailto:Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net
>>>> 
>>>> List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
>>>> ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> 
>>>    ______________________________________________________________
>>>    Hammarlund mailing list
>>>    Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hammarlund
>>>    Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>    Post: mailto:Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net
>>> 
>>>    List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
>>>    ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>    Please help support this email list: 
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Hammarlund mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hammarlund
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net
>>> 
>>> List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
>>> ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Hammarlund mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hammarlund
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net
>> 
>> List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
>> ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
>> 
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hammarlund mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hammarlund
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net
> 
> List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
> ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
> 
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hammarlund mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hammarlund
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net
> 
> List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
> ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
> 
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



More information about the Hammarlund mailing list