[Hammarlund] Age list of HQ-129-X?
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
Mon Mar 23 12:06:54 EDT 2020
The SP-400 is a very fine receiver. My first station receiver
was a surplus BC-779, a version of the SP-200. The 40Mhz version
used a different arrangement for the RF stages with parallel fed
plates, series fed in the standard and MF models. I am not sure
what is in the 400. I think the 400 may not have the Faraday
screens in the antenna coils.
One thing all of the series need is a regulator for the LO. A
VR-150 under the chassis works fine but the plate resistor for
the LO should be changed from 12K to about 8K. Without the
regulator the LO tends to pull with the AVC voltage. The late 400
also had a TC cap in the LO across the tuning capacitor. I don't
know the value, maybe about 5pF, N-750. Will reduce the warm up
drift. I let mine run all the time and it was very stable that
way. Since mine had been modified when I got it I tried all sorts
of things in the RF, converter, and LO. The original circuit
works about as well as anything. Mine had the cathode coupled
triode mod shown in an old CQ magazine. It worked but the
original circuit works better. The modified circuit may have been
quieter but it loaded the RF coils so reduced RF selectivity.
Anyway, its worth putting some work into. I still have this
receiver.
I have two SP-600-JX receivers on the back burner. My problem
is that I can't lift them any more. Hayseed Hamfest makes a
correct power supply cap for them. If yours have the original
paper caps they need a complete recaping. You may find a few mica
caps bad too. Check the 51pF cap in the BFO since it seems to
develop a jump.
Do NOT bend the tuning capacitor plates. They should be
straight. However, the stators and fixed with screw clamps and
fiber washers and can drift off. They are not difficult to
re-center. Some people seem to have done plate bending to get
calibration. Of course they make it impossible and its usually
impossible to straighten out the plates again. I think they were
trying to compensate for mis centered stators.
On 3/20/2020 9:04 PM, Don Cunningham wrote:
> I also have two of the HQ-129X in the repair queue. Both have
> the white lettering, but are not stored where I can see the
> serial numbers. I am currently working on reviving a Super Pro
> SP-400-X and an SP-600, so the 129's and an HQ-180 will have to
> wait.
>
> Hayseed filter caps have always worked fine for me, and are the
> first things I do before even firing the rig up initially. I
> am more of a "user" than doing restorations, I just like the
> old receivers.
> 73,
> Don, WB5HAK (formerly WPE5CTN MANY years ago, HI)
>
> On 3/20/2020 4:17 PM, Ray LaRue wrote:
>> I have acquired a rather nice HQ-129-X in good physical
>> condition. I have not yet recapped it but will get to it
>> shortly. I am pairing it up with a nice rebuilt Johnson
>> Ranger for an operating "classic" station, to go along with my
>> rice boxes.
>>
>> Is there a list of serial numbers online where I could
>> estimate it's age? The serial number on this one is #14574,
>> stamped into the back of the chassis.
>>
>> Your attention is appreciated.
>> Ray, W4BYG
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hammarlund mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hammarlund
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Gary Harmon, K5JWK
> ** For Assistance: gharmon at idworld.net **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
--
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
WB6KBL
More information about the Hammarlund
mailing list