[Hammarlund] Why 2nd RF stage?
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
Sun Nov 30 18:39:51 EST 2014
----- Original Message -----
From: "billriches" <bill.riches at verizon.net>
To: <hammarlund at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Hammarlund] Why 2nd RF stage?
>I had heard somewhere that one reason was to prevent hf
>oscillator signal
> from being transmitted on the rx antenna. The enemy could
> pick it up and
> home in on the ship.
>
> 73,
>
> Bill, WA2DVU
> Cape May
Local oscillator radiation is an important factor. Its
not just to prevent homing on a receiver using the LO its
also to prevent interference between receivers in multiple
receiver set ups. This is probably a more important reason
because many receivers were not used on board ships. It
takes more than just a couple of RF stages to reduce LO
radiation, the oscillator and mixer stages must be well
shielded and the power supply must isolate them. Probably
the reduction of image response was the most important
reason for the use of multiple RF stages. However, they are
not all equal in that reduction. For instance, one of the
military handbooks for WW-2 receivers shows the spurious
responses of several receivers, the Super Pro (I think a
BC-1004C is shown) has only one spur, the image, while the
SX-28 looks like a cornfield.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk at ix.netcom.com
More information about the Hammarlund
mailing list