[Hammarlund] HQ-129-X BFO drift
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
Thu Sep 6 12:59:53 EDT 2012
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Cromwell" <wrcromwell at gmail.com>
To: <Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 4:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Hammarlund] HQ-129-X BFO drift
> On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 11:29 -0700, Richard Knoppow wrote:
>> The BFO in my HQ-129-X drifts a lot. This is thermal
>> drift and is more than a khz from a cold start but it can
>> drift that much after a half-hour warm up. I think this
>> is
>> too much and wonder if its typical. If not something is
>> wrong, maybe one of the mica caps in the circuit has gone
>> bad. The values are not stated in the handbook but are in
>> the RBG book. Since the circuits are almost identical I
>> expect the cap values are the same or very close, does
>> anyone know for certain? If anyone else has experienced
>> this drift and found a cure I would be glad to know it.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Richard Knoppow
>> Los Angeles
>> WB6KBL
>> dickburk at ix.netcom.com
>>
>
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Assuming that you monitored the BFO frequency by an
> independent means
> that doesn't drift that much (frequency counter, crystal
> oscillator,
> etc)....
>
> One source of drift like yours is the tube. In your your
> case the BFO
> tube - V-9, 6SJ7 on the schematic I have. In the HQ-145 I
> had it was the
> VFO that drifted so badly. The VFO tube was great in a
> tube tester but
> an oscillator is NOT a tube tester. I had about a dozen
> replacement
> tubes. One was even worse. Another was just as bad but
> some stopped the
> drift. I could receive an SSB Navy Mars traffic net for an
> hour without
> having to fiddle with it. I did warm it up for a half hour
> or more
> before use. Tube substitution is going to be MUCH easier
> than those
> tank caps. If it is one of those just cut n try...starting
> with the
> values you found for the RGB.
>
> I looked at the schematic and my next suspect after the
> tube would be
> that voltage divider chain that supplies voltage to the
> BFO tube R47,
> R48, R49. Old resistors can be flaky and way out of spec.
>
> Many of the old radios have drift specified much higher
> than is
> acceptable in newer radios but 1 kc in a 455 kc oscillator
> is just too
> much. Good luck with your receiver.
>
> 73,
>
> Bill KU8H
>
Thanks Bill, I check the frequency simply by seeing it
is zero beat with the narrowest crystal passband. I can
check the BFO with a counter to make sure that it and not
the crystal filter is what is drifting. Its possible its
the tube but I think a bad resistor or cap is more likely.
Usually caps jump rather than drift so I think the resistors
are the likely culprits. I have worked with several
Hammarlund receivers and the BFO's generally are pretty
stable.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk at ix.netcom.com
More information about the Hammarlund
mailing list