[Hammarlund] Possible solution for 6C4...

[Carl]

Most likely internal construction rigidity but Ive never taken one apart.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James A. (Andy) Moorer" <jamminpower at earthlink.net>
To: <hammarlund at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Hammarlund] Possible solution for 6C4...


>  Anyone have a clue as to why the 6AH6 should be any more stable? Is it
> just the presence of the screen grid?
>
> Any why the 6AH6, which is more of a power tube? Why not our old friend,
> the 6AU6?
>
> Unclear on the concept, as usual.
>
> -- 
> James A. (Andy) Moorer
> www.jamminpower.com
>
>
> On 6/9/2011 4:32 PM, Kenneth G. Gordon wrote:
>> I am very seriously considering changing the triode, 6C4 HF oscillator in 
>> my
>> HQ-110C to a 6AH6 ECO.
>>
>> The change would be simple, and should be very effective at reducing 
>> drift.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Ken W7EKB
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hammarlund mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hammarlund
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3691 - Release Date: 06/09/11
>