[Hammarlund] Possible solution for 6C4...
James A. (Andy) Moorer
jamminpower at earthlink.net
Thu Jun 9 18:51:06 EDT 2011
Anyone have a clue as to why the 6AH6 should be any more stable? Is it
just the presence of the screen grid?
Any why the 6AH6, which is more of a power tube? Why not our old friend,
the 6AU6?
Unclear on the concept, as usual.
--
James A. (Andy) Moorer
www.jamminpower.com
On 6/9/2011 4:32 PM, Kenneth G. Gordon wrote:
> I am very seriously considering changing the triode, 6C4 HF oscillator in my
> HQ-110C to a 6AH6 ECO.
>
> The change would be simple, and should be very effective at reducing drift.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ken W7EKB
>
More information about the Hammarlund
mailing list