[Hammarlund] Which is better, SP-600 or HQ-180?

[Carl]

It should be if audio quality is important. Adding a productor is also 
easy and non invasive.

I recently took delivery of a HQ-180 and except for an intermittent drop 
in signal Im impressed. Stability is excellent on SSB. Havent had time 
to find the intermittent problem. However listening to AM on USB in a 
3kc filter isnt my idea of enjoyable AM. I can listen to the Red Sox and 
Celtics on a 1928 Radiola 18 and get beter audio.

Carl
KM1H


Carl

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "rbethman" <rbethman at comcast.net>
To: <hammarlund at mailman.qth.net>
Cc: "Carl" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>; <catman351 at yahoo.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Hammarlund] Which is better, SP-600 or HQ-180?


> Except that it wasn't one of the candidates. <BG>
>
> Bob - N0DGN
>
> Carl wrote:
>> HRO-60 <G>
>>
>> Carl
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "C E" <catman351 at yahoo.com>
>> To: <hammarlund at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 12:42 PM
>> Subject: [Hammarlund] Which is better, SP-600 or HQ-180?
>>
>>
>>
>>> All:
>>> Inquiring minds want to know!
>>>
>>> Cal, N6KYR/4
>>>
>>>
>>>      ______________________________________________________________
>>> Hammarlund mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hammarlund
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Hammarlund mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hammarlund
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Hammarlund at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Bob - NØDGN
>