[Hammarlund] Re: SP-400 power supply question and HV electrolytics
Barry L. Ornitz
[email protected]
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:30:50 -0400
John Heck, KC8ETS, asked about a 2 uF 1000 v capacitor in
his SP-400 power supply.
As others have noted, this is not an electrolytic capacitor
but rather a film or far more likely an oil filled paper
capacitor. Generally these have a much lower failure rate
than do electrolytics so there is a good chance the
capacitor may still be good. However as the input
capacitor, it can see power line spikes so it is still
worth checking. Oil-filled capacitors are generally very
reliable. With an input capacitor like this one, a
varistor transient voltage limiter on the power input to
the supply is a good idea for protection. These will clip
the spikes before they reach the transformer. Oil filled
paper capacitors tend to be self-healing, but their leakage
goes up with each puncture event.
As for high voltage electrolytics, the maximum practical
voltage rating of an electrolytic capacitor is around 500
volts. Above this voltage, effects such as scintillation
and localized excessive gradients are prone. You may find
a few old electrolytic capacitors rated for higher voltages
(I have seen 800 volt units), but internally they are two
lower voltage units in series. This should tell the reader
that placing two ordinary electrolytics in series is the
best way to replace these units. The placement of
equalizing resistors in parallel with the electrolytics is
best. These resistors should draw at least ten times the
rated leakage current of the electrolytics. This will
insure approximately equal voltage division. It is best to
be conservative so using two 450 volt electrolytics in
series is the way to replace an 800 volt unit.
73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ [email protected]