[Ham-Mac] new iMac: parallels vs. fusion?

Jack ae8p at att.net
Thu Dec 24 23:46:58 EST 2009


Chris,

	I bought my first Mac 2 years ago and planned on putting XP on it.  The software is built into the Mac to do that.  I bought XP and did the install.  Over the next few months after learning more about how to use the MAC, I removed XP from it and haven't missed it at all.  Try using it without Windows and see how you do.  It's a needless expense in my opinion.  That is of course with Leopard on the Mac.  Earlier versions of OS X may not do it all.

Jack, ae8p






On Dec 24, 2009, at 11:19 PM, EZ Rhino wrote:

	OK gang,

Looks like I'm taking the plunge.  I'm going to be ordering a new  
iMac in the next day or so.  I currently have an older iMac and run  
MLDX and CocoaModem; really looking forward to the new MLDX.

I'm also excited to start running OSX and XP and using XP to run some  
windows apps such as N1MM.  What is the consensus, parallels or  
fusion?  Anything I need to know before I buy?  Looks like there are  
some rebates that make parallels almost free if I order it with the  
computer.

Chris
KF7P


OH yeah, Merry Christmas!!!


______________________________________________________________
Ham-Mac mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-mac
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Ham-Mac at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



More information about the Ham-Mac mailing list