[Ham-Mac] sure wish that...

[Stephen Prior]

Cocoamodem is a fine bit of software, but it doesn't have anywhere near the
number of modes as mixw, doesn't have a truly integrated logbook, dxcluster
support, transceiver control etc. etc.

I confess that I am using Parallels on my Mac Mini Intel core duo 2GHz with
2GHz of RAM and that runs mixw as well as if it were on a windows machine.

It's all a question of individual preference.  For what it does, cocoamodem
works very well.  Personally I prefer greater integration than the
relationship it has with maclogger (by all-time favourite logbook), but
there's nothing out there that does it as far as I know.

One of the great strengths of mixw I think is that it evolved, much as the K
series of transceivers has with Elecraft, very much on the back of a strong
framework of users who had a seemingly never-ending wish-list!

73 Stephen G4SJP


On 28/2/08 01:36, "James Duffey" <JamesDuffey at comcast.net> wrote:

> Have you tried cocoaModem?
> On Feb 26, 2008, at 9:32 AM, schuetzen wrote:
> 
> someone would come out with a MixW for my MacPro (Intel).
> I have no use for anything but MT63, PSK31 and Olivia.
> where do I find that software to run under Leopard???
> without an emulator, of course.
> sigh
> 
> 73 de
> chas/ k5dam
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ham-Mac mailing list
> Ham-Mac at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-mac
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ham-Mac mailing list
> Ham-Mac at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-mac
>