[Ham-Mac] Parallels v Fusion

[John L Merrill]

Lon:

I have used both on my Macbook and either one runs great. I like VMware
Fusion better because it implements usb to serial adapters better that
Parallels and I think overall it runs faster than Parallels. As they say
your mileage may vary. But either one is fine. As you say it's an ugly
thought to run Windows on a Mac but other than Macloggerdx I find no other
ham programs I want to run on a Mac. I run HRD and Writelog with Fusion and
they work fine. Other than Quicken, I don't use Windows on the Mac for
anything else. I would also recommend 2gigs of memory if you haven't
already.

73,
John 

-----Original Message-----
From: ham-mac-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:ham-mac-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Lon Kinley
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 4:19 PM
To: ham-mac at mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Ham-Mac] Parallels v Fusion

I am awaiting the delivery of my new 24" iMac and am looking at the 
options for running Windows (YUK!) on the machine. There was a thread 
several months ago about which application to use, but I didn't keep 
it.

Please, your thought and opinions of Parallels v Fusion.

Thanks,

73,

Lon - W3LK
Naugatuck, Connecticut

_______________________________________________
Ham-Mac mailing list
Ham-Mac at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-mac