[Ham-Mac] Shortfall to Manual QSO Logging
Bob Nielsen
nielsen at oz.net
Tue Oct 31 11:29:54 EST 2006
On Oct 31, 2006, at 6:07 AM, Lon Kinley wrote:
>>
>> I have found and responded to all but a few of the recent QSL cards.
>> Figuring out the year is usually easy but the month and date can
>> be a real
>> challenge. One has printed text for Month/Date/Year with some
>> some graphic
>> symbols below each that defy logic. It is a good thing he had an
>> easy to
>> read printed email address on the card so I could request
>> clarification on
>> the date. I have one that says 04.03.05 and his call in not in my
>> log for
>> March, April or May over 2003, 2004 or 20054. The call may be in
>> one of my
>> computer based contest.log files but they are not summed together
>> for an
>> easy search.
>> Off the soapbox.
>>
>> What do you do with bureau QSL cards that you cannot find in your
>> log?
>
> Throw them in a box to deal with at some point in the future.
I have one of those boxes. The pile keeps getting bigger!
>
> As for the date format, I was taught it should be 31 OCT 2006,
> with the month in the middle using the common, three-letter
> abbreviation, not numbers. This way there is no confusion.
>
I agree. This is the way that the rest of the world does it and we
should adapt (don't even ask me about metric).
For my computer logs, I store them all in a separate directory and
use the grep command from a terminal "grep <call> *" to search. It's
often handy to have these unix tools available in OS X.
I have computerized the paper logs back to 2000 when I changed
callsigns so I could input them into LOTW, but still have 48 years of
paper logs to deal with. Fortunately I don't get many cards for
those days anymore.
73 - Bob, N7XY
More information about the Ham-Mac
mailing list