[Ham-Mac] MacOSG.com and Intel based iMac
Zeff_Wheelock at harvardpilgrim.org
Zeff_Wheelock at harvardpilgrim.org
Fri Jan 13 15:50:50 EST 2006
Now that you mention it, that makes sense. The product is looking for IBM PowerPC code. If MS
decides to offer an Intel version, I would think then it would be pretty fast.
Zeff Wheelock
Lotus Notes Administrator
x33741
zeff_wheelock at harvardpilgrim.org
zwheeloc at tiac.net
Yahoo mail & IM: ZWheeloc
AOL IM: ZeffWheelock (Home - Forwarded when not on-line)
AOL IM: ZWheeloc (Work)
Amateur Radio: KB1KVA
Larry Weil <kc1ih at mac.com>
Sent by:
ham-mac-bounces at mailman.qth To
.net Mac enthusiasts involved in amateur radio
applications <ham-mac at mailman.qth.net>
cc
01/12/2006 03:16 PM
Subject
Re: [Ham-Mac] MacOSG.com and Intel based iMac
Please respond to
Mac enthusiasts involved in
amateur radio applications
<ham-mac at mailman.qth.net>
At 01:17 PM 1/12/2006, Zeff_Wheelock at harvardpilgrim.org wrote:
>I kind of wonder what Virtual PC is going to be like now that there
>"virtually" won't be any code
>conversion from Intel to PowerPC now that everything is Intel. I
>would imagine the speed would be
>greatly increased.
The info on Tuesday was that the current version of VPC will not work
on an Intel Mac.
73 de KC1IH
Larry Weil
Lake Wobegone, NH
_______________________________________________
Ham-Mac mailing list
Ham-Mac at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-mac
More information about the Ham-Mac
mailing list