[Ham-Mac] Re: ARRL web server

[Chuck Counselman]

At 9:21 PM -0500 3/22/02, John E Bastin, K8AJS wrote:
>At 2:39 PM -0500 3/20/02, Chuck Counselman wrote:
>>I suspect that the differences between different peoples' 
>>experiences have to do with Java....
>
>Apparently you didn't even bother to read the reply that you got 
>from Jon Bloom that you posted on the Ham-Mac list. What part of 
>"there is no Java on the ARRL Web site" didn't you understand?

John, look at the time & date, 2:39 PM -0500 3/20/02, of my post, 
which you quote.  Jon Bloom's post, which you quote, followed mine 
and was in response to it.  When his reply appeared, I read and 
understood it.

Don't complain that I "didn't even bother to read the reply" that 
hadn't been written.


>Perhaps you and the others that are having problems with the ARRL 
>web site should take a look at your own systems for conflicts or 
>corrupt software that may be causing your problems locally.

Perhaps you have forgotten that "others that are having problems with 
the ARRL web site" posted details of syntax and other errors that 
they had found on the site.


>This juvenile campaign against Microsoft and the League has very 
>little substance and no real reason to be burning our bandwidth.

1. I have posted _nothing_ to this list on the topic of the ARRL web 
server from the time that you complained about wasted bandwidth, 
until now.  I do not intend to post to this list on the same topic 
again.

2. My 2:39 PM -0500 3/20/02 post appears to have sat at 
mailman.qth.net for two days before being reflected to the list. 
This delay was not my doing.

3. If it was _your_ ox that had been gored, would you have complained?

73 de Chuck, W1HIS