[Ham-Mac] ARRL web server
Chuck Counselman
[email protected]
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:13:54 -0500
I hope that you, my fellow ham-mac subscribers, will contact your
ARRL Directors about this, too. Tnx es and 73 de Chuck, W1HIS
----------------------------------------
>Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:23:10 -0500
>To: [email protected], [email protected]
>From: Chuck Counselman <[email protected]>
>Subject: ARRL web server
>Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
>[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
>[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
>[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
>[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
>[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
>[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
>Bcc:
>X-Attachments:
>
>Why bother you, my ARRL Directors, about the ARRL web server?
>Because I raise a political, policy issue, which as such is properly
>considered and decided by the ARRL Board of Directors; and because
>I've raised the immediate, technical, problem twice with ARRL staff,
>who IMO do not appreciate the policy issue.
>
>The immediate, technical, problem is that the ARRL website does not
>work properly with Netscape's (and possibly other non-Microsoft) web
>browser(s). It works with Microsoft's web browser, and the ARRL
>webmaster says that this is enough. He says, reasonably enough,
>that it's impractical to make the website compatible with every
>possible browser, because there are so many.
>
>But the effect of his decision is to support the illegal (Federal
>courts have ruled) monopolistic, anti-competitive practices of
>Microsoft. As you know, the Attorneys General of Massachusetts and
>several other states are fighting to reign in this behavior.
>
>A diverse and free market in software is in the interest of ham
>radio, more so every day as digital hardware and software permeate
>our hobby. The ARRL should be promoting, not suppressing,
>alternatives to Microsoft-monopoly software.
>
>The ARRL website should be, and could be, compatible with Unix,
>Linux, and Mac operating systems and applications -- not just
>Microsoft-monopoly software. In fact, nearly all of the major,
>national, websites _are_ so compatible.
>
>Thank you and 73 de Chuck, W1HIS