From gayal.rupasinghe at gmail.com Thu Nov 9 10:03:05 2017 From: gayal.rupasinghe at gmail.com (Gayal Rupasinghe) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 20:33:05 +0530 Subject: [Ham-Computers] Question about 5.25" drives. In-Reply-To: <59EE8985.7070407@earthlink.net> References: <59EE8985.7070407@earthlink.net> Message-ID: Unsubscribe pls On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:59 AM, KD7JYK DM09 wrote: > I've recently acquired four new-old-stock 3.5" floppy drives intended for > laptops, but so far, they work with all computers with a USB port as an > external "floppy" drive. > > What I'm looking for, since I've had to upgrade from a computer that had > an internal 5.25" drive, is an EXTERNAL 5.25" drive with USB connectivity. > Were these ever available, or did the technologies not overlap? Anything > out there that works, perhaps a case that I can put my 5.25" floppy drive > into, then connect it to my laptop? I don't mind putting something > together if I can find a nice high-quality case that will take an IDE > floppy drive and convert to USB. > > Ideas? > > Kurt > ______________________________________________________________ > Ham-Computers mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-computers > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Ham-Computers at mailman.qth.net > > List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF > ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com ** > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From johngadd at comcast.net Thu Nov 9 12:13:18 2017 From: johngadd at comcast.net (john) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 17:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Ham-Computers] Question about 5.25" drives. In-Reply-To: References: <59EE8985.7070407@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <763686559.25756960.1510247598741.JavaMail.zimbra@comcast.net> They are available on E bay for $20.00 and less Be sure to search for "External 5.25" enclosures . ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gayal Rupasinghe" To: "Computers (or other) used for amateur radio, communications, or experimenting" Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 10:03:05 AM Subject: Re: [Ham-Computers] Question about 5.25" drives. Unsubscribe pls On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:59 AM, KD7JYK DM09 wrote: > I've recently acquired four new-old-stock 3.5" floppy drives intended for > laptops, but so far, they work with all computers with a USB port as an > external "floppy" drive. > > What I'm looking for, since I've had to upgrade from a computer that had > an internal 5.25" drive, is an EXTERNAL 5.25" drive with USB connectivity. > Were these ever available, or did the technologies not overlap? Anything > out there that works, perhaps a case that I can put my 5.25" floppy drive > into, then connect it to my laptop? I don't mind putting something > together if I can find a nice high-quality case that will take an IDE > floppy drive and convert to USB. > > Ideas? > > Kurt > ______________________________________________________________ > Ham-Computers mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-computers > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Ham-Computers at mailman.qth.net > > List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF > ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com ** > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Ham-Computers mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-computers Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Ham-Computers at mailman.qth.net List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com ** This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From WA5CAB at cs.com Sun Nov 19 02:33:06 2017 From: WA5CAB at cs.com (WA5CAB at cs.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 02:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Ham-Computers] Problem with XP Message-ID: <2cc687.5c0c210a.47428db2@cs.com> This is a long shot, but you never know what someone else might know unless you ask. I still run XP on two machines because two critical programs won't run on anything later. When the machine boots up, there are several instances of svchost.exe loaded. Sometime within the past week or two, I noticed that one of them had the CPU utilization running at 50% all of the time. And Mem Usage was under 10,000 K As the machine goes through the boot process, right after after you can call up the Task Manager, it starts off with the CPU utilization flickering from 0 to 4 or 5%. And the Mem Usage under 10,000 K. Over the next few minutes, both figures climbed until finally reaching 50% and a little over 150 Mb. Sitting here with Task Manager running as I type this, I see that Mem Usage is currently at 152,780 K. When I started writing, it was a little lower. Figuring that I had nothing to lose, I ended the process and everything seemed to keep working. Until I tried to run our accounting system, which is a dBase 5 program. The program loaded OK and everything worked at first until I tried to open the inventory database to see what condition I had said that a piece of radio gear was in. Whereupon the program locked up and it took a three-finger salute to shut it down. So I concluded that this particular instance has something to do with running MSDOS. Does anyone have any idea as to what is screwed up, and how to fix it? Robert Downs - Houston wa5cab dot com (Web Store) MVPA 9480 From johngadd at comcast.net Sun Nov 19 10:12:47 2017 From: johngadd at comcast.net (john) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Ham-Computers] Problem with XP In-Reply-To: <2cc687.5c0c210a.47428db2@cs.com> References: <2cc687.5c0c210a.47428db2@cs.com> Message-ID: <1135980359.45079407.1511104367784.JavaMail.zimbra@comcast.net> Suggesstion INCREASE to MAX RAM . When it fills up it crashes . Microsoft published a big O/S book Should be cheap on e/bay or amazon Rea; cheap these days ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Downs via Ham-Computers" To: Ham-Computers at mailman.qth.net Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2017 2:33:06 AM Subject: [Ham-Computers] Problem with XP This is a long shot, but you never know what someone else might know unless you ask. I still run XP on two machines because two critical programs won't run on anything later. When the machine boots up, there are several instances of svchost.exe loaded. Sometime within the past week or two, I noticed that one of them had the CPU utilization running at 50% all of the time. And Mem Usage was under 10,000 K As the machine goes through the boot process, right after after you can call up the Task Manager, it starts off with the CPU utilization flickering from 0 to 4 or 5%. And the Mem Usage under 10,000 K. Over the next few minutes, both figures climbed until finally reaching 50% and a little over 150 Mb. Sitting here with Task Manager running as I type this, I see that Mem Usage is currently at 152,780 K. When I started writing, it was a little lower. Figuring that I had nothing to lose, I ended the process and everything seemed to keep working. Until I tried to run our accounting system, which is a dBase 5 program. The program loaded OK and everything worked at first until I tried to open the inventory database to see what condition I had said that a piece of radio gear was in. Whereupon the program locked up and it took a three-finger salute to shut it down. So I concluded that this particular instance has something to do with running MSDOS. Does anyone have any idea as to what is screwed up, and how to fix it? Robert Downs - Houston wa5cab dot com (Web Store) MVPA 9480 ______________________________________________________________ Ham-Computers mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-computers Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Ham-Computers at mailman.qth.net List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com ** This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From nn6o.lists at pacbell.net Mon Nov 20 20:06:24 2017 From: nn6o.lists at pacbell.net (nn6o) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 01:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Ham-Computers] Problem with XP References: <1262752268.1955569.1511226384379.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1262752268.1955569.1511226384379@mail.yahoo.com> SVCHOST is the Microsoft program that hosts Windows services. Each instance of SVCHOST can actually be hosting several services - exactly how a service is attached to each SVCHOST instance, I don't know. But, you can see a breakdown of each SVCHOST instance using a utility such as Process Explorer by SysInternals. The SysInternals treasure chest of utilities is so good that Microsoft acquired them several years ago and it's now under their TechNet umbrella of things. More on Process Explorer a little later... Since each SVCHOST instance can host multiple services, it's hard to know exactly what is taking up CPU time without the proper utility (such as Process Explorer). Also, without knowing what services each instance is hosting, you could be killing several services by killing that one SVCHOST instance. But, being that the system is running Windows XP, I'm willing to bet that it's the Automatic Updates service (WUAU) eating up CPU cycles. WUAU is known to cause high CPU utilization esp when the updates database is corrupt or when one of the updates is doing some type of "telemetry" gathering. To find out if it's WUAU, next time you notice high CPU utilization in an SVCHOST instance, try stopping the WUAU service. To do this, open an elevated Command Prompt (run as Administrator) and enter the following: net stop wuauserv and press enter. Wait a minute or two, and check the Task Manager - if CPU utilization returns to normal, then the Windows Update service is the culprit and more diagnosis is needed to determine exactly why. Process Explorer - you can download Process Explorer or the entire SysInternals suite of utilities here: http://www.sysinternals.org Once you install either, run Process Explorer and it will show you a window similar to Windows Task Manager, but in more detail. If you click on the "Process" column header, it will switch views between A-Z sort, Z-A sort, and breakout or threaded view that shows the process hierarchy (this includes showing each service under each instance of SVCHOST). You can also move the mouse pointer over each process to see the threads running under it, or the command-line of how it started. This will help clue you in to what might be eating CPU cycles. Once you've found the particular thread, determine if it's safe to terminate, right-click it, and select "kill process". Or, if you know the service name, it's better to use "net stop servicename" in a command prompt to safely stop the service (or, use "sc stop servicename" as an alternative with no feedback). I hope this helps you track down the issue...I'm pretty sure it's Windows Update, but let us know what you find. If it is Windows Update, there are several possible fixes, but no guarantees. Sometimes, the high cpu use lasts for several minutes to several hours/days, then everything is back to normal - this would be the Windows Updates telemetry gathering mentioned earlier. Or, WUAU might also be trying to self-correct a database problem and is rebuilding it. Suffice it to say, WUAU has it's issues. 73, - Aaron Hsu, NN6O {nn6o}@arrl.net -------------------------------------------- On Sun, 11/19/17, Robert Downs via Ham-Computers wrote: Subject: [Ham-Computers] Problem with XP To: Ham-Computers at mailman.qth.net Date: Sunday, November 19, 2017, 7:33 AM This is a long shot, but you never know what someone else might know unless you ask. I still run XP on two machines because two critical programs won't run on anything later. When the machine boots up, there are several instances of svchost.exe loaded.? Sometime within the past week or two, I noticed that one of them had the CPU utilization running at 50% all of the time.? And Mem Usage was under 10,000 K? As the machine goes through the boot process, right after after you can call up the Task Manager, it starts off with the CPU utilization flickering from 0 to 4 or 5%.? And the Mem Usage under 10,000 K.? Over the next few minutes, both figures climbed until finally reaching 50% and a little over 150 Mb. Sitting here with Task Manager running as I type this, I see that Mem Usage is currently at 152,780 K.? When I started writing, it was a little lower. Figuring that I had nothing to lose, I ended the process and everything seemed to keep working.? Until I tried to run our accounting system, which is a dBase 5 program.? The program loaded? OK and everything worked at first until I tried to open the inventory database to see what condition I had said that a piece of radio gear was in.? Whereupon the program locked up and it took a three-finger salute to shut it down.? So I concluded that this particular instance has something to do with running MSDOS. Does anyone have any idea as to what is screwed up, and how to fix it? Robert Downs - Houston wa5cab dot com (Web Store) MVPA 9480 ______________________________________________________________ Ham-Computers mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-computers Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Ham-Computers at mailman.qth.net List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com ** This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From nn6o.lists at pacbell.net Mon Nov 20 20:03:39 2017 From: nn6o.lists at pacbell.net (nn6o) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 01:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Ham-Computers] Problem with XP References: <1292261623.1980487.1511226219438.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1292261623.1980487.1511226219438@mail.yahoo.com> SVCHOST is the Microsoft program that hosts Windows services. Each instance of SVCHOST can actually be hosting several services - exactly how a service is attached to each SVCHOST instance, I don't know. But, you can see a breakdown of each SVCHOST instance using a utility such as Process Explorer by SysInternals. The SysInternals treasure chest of utilities is so good that Microsoft acquired them several years ago and it's now under their TechNet umbrella of things. More on Process Explorer a little later... Since each SVCHOST instance can host multiple services, it's hard to know exactly what is taking up CPU time without the proper utility (such as Process Explorer). Also, without knowing what services each instance is hosting, you could be killing several services by killing that one SVCHOST instance. But, being that the system is running Windows XP, I'm willing to bet that it's the Automatic Updates service (WUAU) eating up CPU cycles. WUAU is known to cause high CPU utilization esp when the updates database is corrupt or when one of the updates is doing some type of "telemetry" gathering. To find out if it's WUAU, next time you notice high CPU utilization in an SVCHOST instance, try stopping the WUAU service. To do this, open an elevated Command Prompt (run as Administrator) and enter the following: net stop wuauserv and press enter. Wait a minute or two, and check the Task Manager - if CPU utilization returns to normal, then the Windows Update service is the culprit and more diagnosis is needed to determine exactly why. Process Explorer - you can download Process Explorer or the entire SysInternals suite of utilities here: http://www.sysinternals.org Once you install either, run Process Explorer and it will show you a window similar to Windows Task Manager, but in more detail. If you click on the "Process" column header, it will switch views between A-Z sort, Z-A sort, and breakout or threaded view that shows the process hierarchy (this includes showing each service under each instance of SVCHOST). You can also move the mouse pointer over each process to see the threads running under it, or the command-line of how it started. This will help clue you in to what might be eating CPU cycles. Once you've found the particular thread, determine if it's safe to terminate, right-click it, and select "kill process". Or, if you know the service name, it's better to use "net stop servicename" in a command prompt to safely stop the service (or, use "sc stop servicename" as an alternative with no feedback). I hope this helps you track down the issue...I'm pretty sure it's Windows Update, but let us know what you find. If it is Windows Update, there are several possible fixes, but no guarantees. Sometimes, the high cpu use lasts for several minutes to several hours/days, then everything is back to normal - this would be the Windows Updates telemetry gathering mentioned earlier. Or, WUAU might also be trying to self-correct a database problem and is rebuilding it. Suffice it to say, WUAU has it's issues. 73, - Aaron Hsu, NN6O {nn6o}@arrl.net -------------------------------------------- On Sun, 11/19/17, Robert Downs via Ham-Computers wrote: Subject: [Ham-Computers] Problem with XP To: Ham-Computers at mailman.qth.net Date: Sunday, November 19, 2017, 7:33 AM This is a long shot, but you never know what someone else might know unless you ask. I still run XP on two machines because two critical programs won't run on anything later. When the machine boots up, there are several instances of svchost.exe loaded.? Sometime within the past week or two, I noticed that one of them had the CPU utilization running at 50% all of the time.? And Mem Usage was under 10,000 K? As the machine goes through the boot process, right after after you can call up the Task Manager, it starts off with the CPU utilization flickering from 0 to 4 or 5%.? And the Mem Usage under 10,000 K.? Over the next few minutes, both figures climbed until finally reaching 50% and a little over 150 Mb. Sitting here with Task Manager running as I type this, I see that Mem Usage is currently at 152,780 K.? When I started writing, it was a little lower. Figuring that I had nothing to lose, I ended the process and everything seemed to keep working.? Until I tried to run our accounting system, which is a dBase 5 program.? The program loaded? OK and everything worked at first until I tried to open the inventory database to see what condition I had said that a piece of radio gear was in.? Whereupon the program locked up and it took a three-finger salute to shut it down.? So I concluded that this particular instance has something to do with running MSDOS. Does anyone have any idea as to what is screwed up, and how to fix it? Robert Downs - Houston wa5cab dot com (Web Store) MVPA 9480 ______________________________________________________________ Ham-Computers mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-computers Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Ham-Computers at mailman.qth.net List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com ** This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html