[Ham-Computers] Change User Name & Password in Router Settings: Is it more Secure?
Loren Moline WA7SKT
lmoline at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 22 12:28:08 EDT 2016
Jim this is from the manual for the cable modem/router
To log in to the modem router:
1. Type http://192.168.0.1 in the address field of your web browser.
Loren Moline WA7SKT
Member: Pacific Northwest VHF Society and ARRL
Member: Hearsat Satellite Monitoring Group. www.uhf-satcom.com
Member: CVARS-Chehalis Valley Amateur Radio SocietyStarchat IRC: Channel = #hearsat
RF Electronics: Starchat IRC: Channel = #rfelectronics
Grid: CN86mr
> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:45:43 -0700
> To: ham-computers at mailman.qth.net; ham-computers at mailman.qth.net
> From: hro5-2 at cox.net
> Subject: Re: [Ham-Computers] Change User Name & Password in Router Settings: Is it more Secure?
>
> After entering 192.168.1.1, using Firefox and Chrome. there is a
> delay while I assume the computer attempts to bring it up, then times
> out. IE brings up Bing. If I use the command prompt, a screen
> immediately appears, saying Windows cannot find ....... The Netgear
> operators manual says to use 192.168.1.1 for.....
>
> I think Cox has locked it. It would make life easier for their
> support staff to eliminate one potential problem. I have used
> 192.168.1.1 before on other routers with no problems.
>
> My big question: Is their any real security advantage to changing
> the username and password unless you are concerned about someone in
> your home doing bad things.
>
> Jim
>
>
> At 12:05 AM 3/22/2016, Jim Hill wrote:
> >In the past, I entered 192.168.1.1 and changed my user name and
> >password to increase security, but recently rented a Netgear N450
> >CG3000Dv2 modem-router from Cox Cable. Cox seems to be having
> >Internet problems from time to time, and having a device they
> >"bless" might make troubleshooting easier. Also, I didn't like my
> >Ciso Linksys EA2700 router. If I like the Netgear, I'll buy one.
> >
> >I can't access 192.168.1.1. I have not contacted tech support yet,
> >but then thought preventing access might be intentional to make it
> >easier for them to resolve problems.
> >
> >Then I had another thought - is there any real security benefit for
> >the average home user to make the changes? There is nobody in my
> >home that will involved in "bad" things.
> >
> >Jim, w6ivw
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Ham-Computers mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-computers
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Ham-Computers at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Ham-Computers
mailing list