[Ham-Computers] Is Smaller Really Larger?
Duane Fischer, W8DBF
dfischer at usol.com
Wed Sep 13 17:52:28 EDT 2006
Hello All,
I would greatly appreciate it if one of you would explain some object
resolution puzzles to me. Some who are sighted, unlike myself, may benefit
also. Thanks!
FYI: I was normally sighted until the eve of my eighteenth birthday when a
careless Pheasant hunter shot me.
I have a printed document that measures 8W by 10H, portrait orientation. I
scanned it at the default DPI of 150, quarter inch margins, both sides, top
and bottom. It was scanned in color. It was saved as a .jpg with no
compression.
The image printed out fine. Correct margins, correct size.
I scanned the image a second time, but I increased the DPI to 300. I also
used 5% compression.
This time the image was large enough that the last line of text was missing.
It also pushed the margins out.
Here is where I am confused. When the number of dots in a given area
increases, from 150 per inch to 300 per inch, the image quality, AKA
resolution?, improves. Instead of making the image smaller, it made it
larger. I thought that less dots per inch would make it larger with lower
resolution, but it is working in reverse, or so it seems based on the
description related to me.
What I want is a quarter inch border/margin, all the way around. The image
should be 8X10. However, I can get along with a half inch border and smaller
image. The image could be between 5X7 and 8X10, for instance.
I want the best detail I can get.
Since the image consists of four color photos and some text, I saved it as a
.tif I also saved it as a .jpg for comparison.
The .tif is too large, for some reason.
How did I get the original image? My daughter used some version of Adobe and
created it. She printed a copy with quarter inch margins. The file she gave
me was the one Adobe writes with its own particular extension. Which fails
to load into any software I have! Adobe I do not use for personal reasons.
Since I had the image on paper, I thought I could just scan it, size it to
be an 8X10, save it to disc and print it. Which is exactly what I did. The
problem arose when the higher resolution image did not fit the 8.5X11 paper
I was using.
The scanned image at 150 DPI fit, but I thought I could improve the quality
by doing what I have beeninstructed to do by those who know what they are
doing when it comes to graphics. Namely, increase the DPI for scanning and
the compress it down to fit.
Help!
What is the best way to get a good scan of this image and then print it on
normal photo soft gloss paper stock of 8.5X11 without exceeding the margins
and/or going off the page?
Duane W8DBF
dfischer at usol.com
More information about the Ham-Computers
mailing list