[Ham-Computers] Linux?
Paul
mooney at cytanet.com.cy
Sat Aug 27 14:36:35 EDT 2005
fkamp at comcast.net wrote:
> Is this the list that had a discussion on why more
> hams dont use Linux?
>
> I recall seeing such a discussion somewhere about
> a week or so ago.
>
> One person suggested investigating Puppy Linux. I
> did. At first it did not work. Got some sort of
> interrupt handling error. So I tried it on
> another computer. This time it worked.
>
> I have been playing with linux distros for years.
> Tried Red Hat 5.2, 6.1, 9.0; Mandrake 6.0,
> 8.1,8.2; Suse, Slackware, even FreeBSD (which is
> not Linux). They all had varying degrees of
> installation difficulty and resulted in systems
> that were too slow (older computers), with too few
> windows compatible applications, and of
> questionable worth. So I always reverted back to
> some version of MS Windows.
I started with RH 5, and the difference in all the distributions since
those days (not that long ago) is almost unbelievable.
Now, I don't see a great deal of difference between the distributions -
I prefer mandrake because its software management (urpmi) is (I believe)
better than Debians (flame wars stuff I know).
It took me 2 hours to install mandrake 10.1 on a friends computer with
everything running (we'd formatted the harddrive to get rid of over 230
nasties), and then over 2 days to install XP, find/install the
printer/scanner/etc drivers, the anti-virus, spyware, firewall,
&re-install office software, etc.
The apps for radio are improving all the time (you've probably already
found http://radio.linux.org.au/ )
I've made a few copies of 'Knoppix for hams' CDs and handed them out to
local club members, who have been amazed by what they've got on one disk.
And no, I won't be going out to by a new 3 GHz computer, with 512 Mb
memory and a dedicated DirectX 9 video card so I can run Ms Vista.
Paul
5B8BA/G7SPV
More information about the Ham-Computers
mailing list