[Hallicrafters] Communications Receivers - why speakers separate?

[Steve Sutfin]

It was always my thought that the issue was 'stability'; not  
cheapness. Even though the cabinets were metal the vibration from a  
speaker could affect stability in the older tube rigs. And of course  
that was before hollow -state and PLL.
YMMV,
Steve k7dna

On May 30, 2014, at 6:54 PM, Peter VK6PM wrote:

> I've been chatting with some younger amateurs on a local net, and  
> the question of why communications receivers did not come supplied  
> with built-in loudspeakers emerged.
>
> Some of the younger guys reckon that  it appears to be at the  
> outmost extremity of "stinginess" that you would have to buy the  
> speaker separately.
>
> Historically, broadcast receivers from the crystal set era onwards  
> came with a built in loudspeaker.
>
> I shot down the argument that it was just USA companies (which was  
> the original beef, aimed at the Lafayette HA-600), pointing out  
> that Eddystone (UK) STC and Kingsley (Aust) also followed the  
> practice.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas on this one? I don't have any sensible  
> answers for the young blokes.
>
> Regards
>
> Peter VK6PM
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast!  
> Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hallicrafters mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html