[Hallicrafters] SX-100 vs SX-88

[Carl]

I like my R-274/SX-73; excellent performance at a fraction the cost of an 
88. The only 88 I like is a Rocket 88.

Carl


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Everette" <radiocompass at yahoo.com>
To: <WA1KBQ at aol.com>; <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>; "lee" 
<pulsarxp at embarqmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] SX-100 vs SX-88


With the S-38 surely coming in a VERY distant (as in light years) third.

73

Mike
W4DSE



--- On Sat, 5/5/12, lee <pulsarxp at embarqmail.com> wrote:

> From: lee <pulsarxp at embarqmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] SX-100 vs SX-88
> To: WA1KBQ at aol.com, hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
> Date: Saturday, May 5, 2012, 7:56 PM
>
> Yes, both the SX-88 and SX-100 are nice receivers.
> However, they sure don't
> compare to one of the S-38s!
>
> Lee, w0vt
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hallicrafters mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Hallicrafters mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net

List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **


This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2411/4981 - Release Date: 05/06/12