[Hallicrafters] FYI

[Carl]

I completely agree Paul.

Jim has been waging a little war in my direction for quite awhile after I 
questioned the correctness of some of his statements. He considers any 
criticism to be beligerent which is a laugh considering your backround.

He has been so petty as to even publish private email comments and to make 
snide comments on several forums when I havent even been posting.
Then todays Maxwell comment that doesnt even concern Hallicrafters.

Im surprised Duane or George havent asked him to cut it out or put him out 
to pasture for awhile.

The spin and damage control in Jims next reply should be good for a real 
laugh, he always has to get in the last word. There comes a point and I just 
ignore him.

Meanwhile I have to get back to a HQ-150 Im upgrading for a customer.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul" <w2ec at bmjsports.com>
To: <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>; "James Liles" <james.liles at comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] FYI


Hi James,

Not sure why you are so defensive.

>> You have come to a conclusion that is incorrect and inappropriate! I have
>> purchased every ER issue that contains information that is of interest to 
>> me.

As for the conclusion being incorrect, where in the following request does 
it provide the information that you have already purchased every ER issue of 
interest to you, that the article you want is packed up and unavailable at 
the moment?

>> Do you have a copy of the changes for the SX-117 that were in Electric
>> Radio?? I would be quite interested in that article and the author.

Since you were asking for a copy, with no additional information, it reads 
as is if you are trying to circumvent purchasing a copy. What other 
conclusion could a reasonable person come to, something we in law 
enforcement take into consideration when evaluating situations. I did not 
have the additional and very pertinent information that could have led me to 
a different conclusion.

> I would be quite interested in that article and the author.

I'm sorry, but the above request does not make it "obvious that I needed 
more information ".
It only looked to me, from that sentence, that you wanted a copy of the 
article and to know who the author was.

As for inappropriate, I can't even begin to see where it could be 
inappropriate. In my case I was just commenting on Carl's position. Just 
think of it as a reminder to all of us about being careful when sharing 
information that might be otherwise "protected" and the need to support 
those that develop and provide this information.

As for writing articles, I have written for and been published in the Hollow 
State Newsletter, so it's not like I haven't made my own small contribution 
to our hobby.

I'm not trying to start another "flame" war, I just think that you have read 
too much into Carls and my comments. If all the facts had been presented at 
first (you already owned the copies but they weren't accessible and you 
wanted to contact the author for more information), I expect Carls and my 
responses wouldn't even have been made.

73,
Paul W2EC
______________________________________________________________
Hallicrafters mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net

List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **


This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2437/5112 - Release Date: 07/05/12