[Hallicrafters] [National] USS North Carolina after action report

[springertool at wyoming.com]

Carl, what years were you allowed to operate /mm in the Navy?  I was for a brief period in 1969 with my SR-160 and a Webster Bandspanner
on the after-mast.  Turns out that it had been banned, but, the captain didn't know ....

Jon, K0FOP

--- km1h at jeremy.mv.com wrote:

From: "Carl" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>
To: "National Radio Equipment" <national at mailman.qth.net>,	<hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>, <rca at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] [National] USS North Carolina after action	report
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 08:58:41 -0500

I dont remember ever having to change a 860 or 861 in those rigs Mike, and 
they got daily use, mostly on CW. The note was almost T9 on 20M with just 
enough warble to give it some non objectionable character. A HB project here 
has been looking for a 861 for years.

When the Navy finally approved /MM operation I was permitted on the TBM and 
later the URC-32 during silent traffic times. There was a SRT-14 on another 
ship but the radio room was too cramped for comfortable operating, I pretty 
much limited operation to phone patches.

Is the NC using the RBx series? I have a set here, great radios even today.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Everette" <radiocompass at yahoo.com>
To: <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>; <rca at mailman.qth.net>; 
<national at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 10:40 PM
Subject: [National] USS North Carolina after action report


> The Battleship North Carolina was indeed on the air Saturday afternoon 
> (1-15) from about 1:37 pm until 4 pm EST.  We stayed on 40 meters the 
> whole time.  The TBM-4 transmitter was used; it seems that tuning this rig 
> (a big, BIG black monolith!) on 20 meters is a bit touchy, plus it takes 
> the transmitter's master oscillator a long time to "settle down" and the 
> effect gets more pronounced with increasing frequency due to frequency 
> multiplication.  Those issues figured into the choice of bands.
>
> We were running the transmitter at "low power" or around 100 watts out; 
> it's capable of 400 to 500 watts, but the 861 final tubes are very scarce 
> and they don't want to push it.  Plus, there may be a risk of 
> overstressing the old motor-generator set;  "spitzensparken" are not a 
> desired phenomenon.
>
> The number of contacts was rather low, about 8 complete to be exact and 
> several more that didn't complete due to QRM -- mostly from digital 
> stations that (dare I say it) seemed to gang up to run us off the first 
> choice of frequency, 7035 KHz.  We moved up to about 7044 and things went 
> a bit better.  Since there was not an abundance of people calling us, we 
> did a lot of rag chewing, which was great fun.
>
> We got consistent T7 and T8 reports, which could be caused by one or more 
> issues.  Could be SWR...?  Could be a funky tube...?  Could be a mistuned 
> multiplier stage...?  Could be a bad bypass cap somewhere...?  Could be 
> that something needs better grounding...?  Who knows?  The ship's radio 
> crew tells me that the TBM-4 works perfectly on 80 meters but the "growl" 
> modulation gets worse as the frequency goes up.
>
> This isn't a quick-shift transmitter.  If it's moved even 2 or 3 KHz from 
> where it has been tuned up, a great deal of retuning needs to be done on 
> all the stages.
>
> We had to therefore pick a frequency that seemed clear, then hope "if we 
> call them, they will come."  Well, a few did; and we heard some excellent 
> signals but not very far away.  The best DX was Boston.
>
> If we missed you, some of the problems were due to local QRM of an audio 
> nature.  The RBC receiver was on a speaker, and tour groups came through 
> the area several times.  Lots of people talking in the radio area while we 
> were on the air made copying difficult.  Also, the operators (me included) 
> didn't really have time enough to become familiar with the receiver before 
> actually going on the air.
>
> The original plan was to operate until maybe 4:30 or 5 pm, but the fact 
> that it was getting real cold down there -- big firebottles 
> notwithstanding --  sort of prompted us to shut down a bit early.
>
> Sorry we didn't get on 20; it seems that a number of folks were listening 
> for us there.  I don't have a clue what transpired with the SSB station; 
> they were set up in a different radio room a deck below where the CW 
> station was located.  Obviously they weren't using vintage gear....
>
> I hope to be allowed another opportunity to operate from the USS NC in the 
> future.  It definitely was a fun way to spend a Saturday.
>
> 73
>
> Mike
> W4DSE
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> National mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/national
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:National at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

______________________________________________________________
Hallicrafters mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net

List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com ** 


This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html