[Hallicrafters] Best RX?

[Carl]

The SX-111 is a hamband SX-110 which is a SX-99 and on back to the SX-9.

You already have my SX-101 opinion but you havent said what you intend to 
use any of them for?

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "rbethman" <rbethman at comcast.net>
To: <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] Best RX?


>
> What ever happened to the ORIGINAL question/post?
>
> Somehow it got painted over and/or buried.
>
> Bob Macklin has size, space, and $ limitations.  He "presented" the
> choices and was asking about the SX-101 and the SX-111.
>
> Bob - N0DGN
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bob Macklin"<macklinbob at msn.com>
>> To: "Halicrafters"<Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010  11:23 AM
>> Subject: [Hallicrafters] Best RX?
>>
>>
>>> What was  Hallicrafters best overall receiver?
>>>
>>> I am familiar with the  SX-28 and SX-100. I have a SX-110 which leaves a
>>> lot to be desired. A  SX-110 is just a SX-99 with a sliderule dial.
>>>
>>> I'm interested  in knowing about the SX-101 and SX-111.
>>>
>>> Bob Macklin
>>>   K5MYJ
>>> Seattle, Wa.
>>> "Real Radios Glow In The Dark"
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hallicrafters mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
>
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html