[Hallicrafters] SX32 versus SX28A
Carl
km1h at jeremy.mv.com
Mon Jun 14 10:57:09 EDT 2010
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Carl <km1h at jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
> Yep, PP as mentioned Todd. The WW2 SX-28FCC monitoring model and the
> SX-17FCC are the only ones I know of that went single ended to conserve
> power when mobile. I have both SX-17 versions.
Interesting, and good to know. I always thought of the 32 being to the
28 what the R-390A is to the R-390: a cost-reduced, economized
version. Seems to be less the case here. Considering just the two
control changes, it hardly seems worth making an entirely new model
for.
~ Todd, KA1KAQ/4
I think that was the intention Todd but Halli raised the price of the SX-28
and slid the 32 into the old slot. The price difference wasnt enough to
qualify as a new model and it was killed off fast.
I havent put it thru a real testing but I suspect the 32 has better signal
handling with that 6L7 stage gone. The 28 is pretty much a dog in that area
and needs a serious gain redistribution.
Carl
KM1H
More information about the Hallicrafters
mailing list