[Hallicrafters] Snow / Antenna question.
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at verizon.net
Sat Feb 2 21:21:47 EST 2008
On 2 Feb 2008 at 19:54, Bill Gerhold wrote:
> The absorption of RF by snow or ice is negligible.
True. However, for a Yagi, the water between the elements,
since it has a completely different diaelectric constant than
air, can have severe effects on the antenna pattern as well
as SWR.
I know this for a fact, since I have been involved in
telemetry of seismic data on various frequencies at VHF
(around 150 Mhz). We use Yagis mounted on mountain-top
fire towers, etc. to telemeter the seismic signal back to the
receiving/processing station, sometimes as much as 50
miles away.
Maximum power into the antenna is usually 100 mW,
although we have been licensed for 5 watts output for
certain critical stations.
When the ice around the elements reaches a certain point,
the pattern of the Yagi is very badly effected. First the
forward gain drops lower and lower, until finally the pattern
reverses a full 180 degrees.
I first built several Yagis, using the NBS data on maximum
gain, using 1/2" steel conduit for the elements, and a very
solid bit of steel square tubing for the boom. The antennas
were hell for stout and the directivity and gain were very
close to what I had calculated from the NBS data.
We put them up during the summer, of course, and the
signal levels were quite good.
As soon as we started getting some snow on the mountain-
tops, we noticed that received signal strength started to
drop. After a very severe ice storm up there, our signals
were unusable, and we concluded that the antennas had
come down, despite our attempt to make them as strong
and as secure as possible.
One of our crew managed to snowmobile into one of the
stations that winter, and radioed back to us that the antenna
and feedline were still in place, but that the ice-ball on the
antenna was about 3 feet in diameter, completely
enveloping the antenna.
We then had a long talk with a commercial builder of
telemetry antennas, and were told that antennas had to be
specially designed to deal with that much ice or snow, and
even the best of their designs only mitigated the signal loss,
but could not eliminate it. We were told that if the ice built
up to the levels we were experiencing, nothing could be
done about the signal loss except by using some method of
heating the antennas, or enclosing them in a fibreglass
housing that would prevent ice build-up between elements.
The cost was too high, and we just had to live with the
problem.
However, in answer to the other question, no amount of RF
an amateur station could possibly generate would have the
slightest effect towards melting ice on an antenna. For one
thing, there isn't enough electrical or RF resistance in the
ice to cause heating, and the elements themselves certainly
would never get warm from RF either.
Just adjust the tuner and live with it.
Ken W7EKB
More information about the Hallicrafters
mailing list