[Hallicrafters] Spiral Fluorescants
Robert Nickels
ranickel at comcast.net
Mon Dec 8 23:21:01 EST 2008
TC Dailey wrote:
> The transformer runs rather HOT, so that quite a bit of energy is
> wasted in USELESS HEAT, as opposed to USEFUL heat, which I recover in
> the shop.
Tom,
I'm not going to argue your CFL feelings with you but this statement
leaves me puzzled. Please clarify how heat generated by an incandescent
lamp is more "useful" than the same amount of heat generated by
something else. (CFLs produce about 75% less heat than incandescents).
For those interested, CFLs use electronic ballasts - pictures and
schematics can be viewed here: http://www.pavouk.org/hw/lamp/en_index.html
Each lamp incorporates a DC power supply that drives a pair of switching
transistors oscillating in the tens-of-kilohertz range (Energy Star
requires >= 40khz) to create the AC that drives the fluorescent lamp.
A typical household these days has dozens of similar switching power
supplies. These oscillators must comply with EMC regulations, which in
the US fall under FCC 47CFR Part 18 - Industrial, Scientific, and
Medical Devices. FCC rules limit the amount of RF voltage that can be
radiated along the power line to 250 microvolts in the .45 to 30 mhz
range. That's not much power and under normal circumstances, will never
be heard on ham gear.
The easiest way to satisfy yourself that CFLs aren't big RFI generators
is to do a simple experiment. Tune in a weak station on a portable AM
radio, then hold it up near an operating CFL. You'll find that you
have to be within a few inches to hear any electrical noise. If you
try this experiment with a shortwave portable, you'll find even less
noise due to the filtering in the lamp that attenuates the higher
frequencies even more.
73 Bob W9RAN
More information about the Hallicrafters
mailing list