[Hallicrafters] OLD OR VINTAGE OR ANTIQUE

Julian Bunn Julian.Bunn at caltech.edu
Tue Sep 18 15:25:19 EDT 2007


For some, like me, it's not so much the build quality, but the design
that attracts. These older radios just look great, in my opinion. The
early 38 (although I don't have one) in particular is a beautiful looking
radio with the dial shapes and layout. Clearly vintage. I would never call
it an antique, though. That it's old goes without saying.

Another 2c towards the pile of coins on the table.

Julian



Todd, KA1KAQ wrote:
> On 9/18/07, Dick Blaney <wb8mhe at bright.net> wrote:
>> DEM'S FIGHTIN' WORDS, Sonny!!!! I'm a' callin' you out to the middle of Main
>> Street at high noon.  We'll settle this matter with six  shooters.  Since
>> 1946 I've owned at least one S-38, and now have six, including that original
>> that I bought from Concord Radio in Chicago in 1946.  The only ones I've
>> seen that were "junk" had been abused and misused by some jerk that didn't
>> know what a Hallicrafter Radio was or represented, no matter what model
>> number it carried.  Of course, you are entitled to your opinion, but I'm
>> reminded that "Opinions are like hemorrhoids, only A.. Ho... have them
>> Dick, WB8MHE
> 
> I think Carl was just using the more readily-accepted shortcut for the
> term 'of low quality'. I agree completely with his assessments and
> comparisons. Never was lucky *cough* enough to own the venerable S-38,
> but my first SW receiver was a step or two higher: the S-40B. It
> wasn't junk, just really cheap and marginal. I got hours of enjoyment
> from it and never would've known what I was missing, had it not been
> for that $5 National RAO I tripped over beneath a table at a garage
> sale.
> 
> Don't get me wrong - I understand and fully appreciate the gap that
> Halli, Heath, and WRL filled with some lower quality items. Obviously
> there was a need and a market, or the stuff wouldn't still be so
> prolific, endlessly surfacing on ebay, at hamfests, yard sales and so
> on.
> 
> If you were to set a brand new S-38 next to an equally new SX-28 or
> SX-88, you might think.....that dinky little radio looks like a piece
> of junk! If you had nothing to compare it against, it might not look
> so bad. Most of us were never lucky enough to have that exposure early
> on, which is a blessing it disguise. It allowed us to develop an
> appreciation, through experience.
> 
> Which is why I, too, cannot understand why anyone would pay so much
> for an S-38 - ebay or otherwise. 'Nostalgia' does crazy things to
> people.
> 
> 
> ~ Todd,  KA1KAQ
> ______________________________________________________________
> Hallicrafters mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
> ----
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF **for assistance**
> dfischer at usol.com
> ----
> Hallicrafters Collectors International: http://www.w9wze.org
> 


More information about the Hallicrafters mailing list