[Hallicrafters] Re: MOVIE RECEIVER MYSTERY SOLVED

[Peter Markavage]

They would lose money either way. It's a movie; props are props; if you
want some fictional accuracy, a museum is the place to go. I go to movies
to be entertained; attention to prop detail is never high on my movie
list criteria.
Pete, wa2cwa

On Wed, 9 May 2007 13:19:36 -0400 "Todd, KA1KAQ" <ka1kaq at gmail.com>
writes:
> I think the bigger issue is, Pete - if anyone ever made a movie to
> suit a bunch of radio nuts through accuracy and attention to detail 
> -
> they'd lose a lot of money. No one else would sit through it. Just
> imagine going to a movie about knitting, with all the correct 
> needles,
> yarn, and rocking chairs... (o:
> 
> ~ Todd,  KA1KAQ
> 
> On 5/9/07, Peter Markavage <manualman at juno.com> wrote:
> > I don't think they would care.
> > Pete, wa2cwa
> >
> > On Wed, 09 May 2007 04:42:58 -0400 Ron Lawrence KC4YOY
> > <kc4yoy at carolina.rr.com> writes:
> > > Oh yeah, check out the silly movie "Frequency"
> > > where they used a HeathKit receiver as a transceiver
> > > to take to the dead.
> 
>