[Hallicrafters] New Orleans on my SX-16

[~DA~]

Well slap me silly. I'd better get on the horn and
apologize to ol' Dlen Hauser fur passin' some
untruths!

Seein' how yur out to edumacate me, a better approach
might be: 

"If you're interested in these types of broadcasts, I
might recommend the AMFMTVDX Mailing List - Amfmtvdx
is a closed list with two administrators (David Sharp
and Saul Chernos).  All posts are reviewed before they
get distributed and they run a tight ship, keeping
things pretty well on-topic.  As an added bonus,
there's no chance of spammers getting any of their
garbage into this list.  If you're interested in
joining the discussions in amfmtvdx, just send a
message with no text in the subject line, text only in
the body as "subscribe amfmtvdx" (no quotes), and
address your e-mail to majordomo at qth.net  As well,
this mailing list is also available in digest form. 
To subscribe to the digest, simply send a message with
no text in the subject line, text only in the body as
"subscribe amfmtvdx-digest" (no quotes), and again
address your e-mail to majordomo at qth.net

73,
Duane Fischer, W8DBF"


--- "Duane Fischer, W8DBF" <dfischer at usol.com> wrote:

> You could have noticed that delay had you used the
> Internet feed from both
> stations as we did.	
> 	
> This information was put out by Dlen Hauser, 'World
> Of Radio', on numerous radio
> lists. Including a request today for people to stop
> posting the wrong
> information and time schedules, see the AMFMTVDX
> list -
> 
> ----------
> From: ~DA~ <iluznst at yahoo.com>
> To: Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] New Orleans on my SX-16
> Date: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 6:13 PM
> 
> I should probably clarify as it seems I confused and
> mislead some people. It WAS WHRI on 15285, but the
> broadcast I heard was WWL, whether it was an
> internet
> feed, chicken feed simulcast, multicast, whatever. I
> serioulsly doubt that WWL 870 would be able to make
> it
> to Los Angeles mid-day AND on 15285 (that would
> definately be some funky propigation) and actually I
> would have no way to "note a 70 sec delay" unless I
> actually had both 870 and 15285.
> 
> I will look forward to being more precise in my
> "discoveries".
> 
> Irrespective, after the SX-16 got its tune-up last
> month, it's hotter than hell! 
> 
> DA de DA


	
		
______________________________________________________
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/