[Hallicrafters] SX-42 progress and new postings
Craig Roberts
crgrbrts at verizon.net
Tue Feb 8 13:48:14 EST 2005
Holy mackeral! -- those ladies in Chicago sure used a lot of solder!
I've been asked to keep y'all posted on my SX-42 restoration, so here's
the story thus far:
The best news is that my bandswitch is in perfect shape -- not a hint of
undue heating. What a relief! I'm almost half-way through the recapping
and resistor replacement phase. Now, I'm one of those anal types who
insists upon stripping out old components completely -- down to the
terminal -- whenever physically practical and whenever it doesn't pose
an undue threat to other components. The SX-42's pretty rugged with big
ole, honkin' terminals, so that's not a problem with this radio. The
practice is very time consuming, though. A lot of the labor is expended
wicking huge gobs of original solder off the connections. I truly
believe one of the reasons our Hallicrafters boatanchors are so heavy is
because of all the lead wasted on the factory solder joints. Okay, I
don't really truly believe that, but you get my drift. How else can you
explain how my neatly soldered Collins 75S-3 is one-quarter of the
weight of my SX-42, hmmmm?? (I suppose it could the absence of a
45-pound power transformer, 103-gang tuning cap and cast iron chassis).
I'm very fortunate that the radio has been largely unmolested.
Replacement of the power supply electrolytic with separate caps and the
substitition of one coupling cap seem to be the only repairs done to
this set during its history. This makes life a lot easier now. As you
know, it's a lot harder to work on a radio that's been "repaired to
death."
Even in this early stage of restoration, the SX-42 plays strongly on all
bands -- including FM -- and the audio is superb. The only "glitches"
are a very wobbly BFO("C-C-C-QQQ-Q") and dental pain inducing overload
on very strong signals. I expect to cure the latter problem as I finish
recapping the AVC line, though the 50KW BC station at 1500 KHz a half
mile from my house may still be problematical. I must say, the radio
demonstrates astounding sensitivity (as is often the case with single
conversion sets).
As others who've restored the SX-42 have noted, a fair number of
resistors are out of spec -- mostly wildly high. But, that's to be
expected with old carbon composition devices. The "bulletproof" micas
of this vintage are also starting to fail, so those repairing units from
the 40's and 50's can no longer assume that the "postage stamps" will
still carry the mail, so to speak.
I am grateful to several friends who've helped with this project so far.
I've gotten much wonderful advice and encouragement, skillfully rendered
wiring diagrams, details of updates and mods, beautiful and inspiring
photographs and offers of other aid. And thank you to the previous
owner, a list member, who represented the radio accurately and priced it
fairly (and packed it well for shipping, too).
I'll continue my work over the next couple of weeks and let you know how
it's going.
By the way, I've posted a new, cleaned up version of the original SX-42
manual on my website. It's at www.aerialacts.com/Halli_SX42_manual.pdf .
This file, besides looking much better, is a lot smaller than the first
version I posted a few days ago. It's still a little over 14 MB, though,
so please be patient when you click on it. Even with a broadband
connection, it takes several minutes to download and display.
I've also posted a high-resolution, multi-page version of the SX-42
schematic at www.aerialacts.com/SX42_schem.pdf . It's the original
factory schematic enlarged and broken into eight, labeled 8.5 x 11
pages. This document makes the component values actually readable (!)
and can be printed conveniently. It's about 3.5 MB in size.
Again, if you'd like hard copies of these documents, please ask. I'll be
happy to send them to you free of charge. It's a way of saying thanks
for all the help and friendship I get from members of this group.
73,
Craig
W3CRR
More information about the Hallicrafters
mailing list