[Hallicrafters] Thank You to all that have responded.

[Rodger Singley]

Hello list,

I agree that the SX-101 is better if it is for ham use (I have an
SX-101A and Mk3) along with an SX-100 but for general coverage the 100
is a nice radio and does fine for ham use.  In fact my first novice
contact in '75 was made using a Johnson Valiant and an SX-62 so the 100
would have been a big step up.  As it was, a local ham took pity on me
and loaned me an SX-101A the second week of my novice career-what a
difference stability and an extra 7 or 8 inches of bandspread make!  I
went from working W5's and 4's to working VQ9 and other European and
African stations with the 101A, probably the most fun I ever had with
ham radio.

Rodger WQ9E



-----Original Message-----
From: hallicrafters-admin at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:hallicrafters-admin at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bruce
Sugarberg
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:10 PM
To: hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
Cc: Douglas Kearney
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] Thank You to all that have responded.

Hello All,

The SX-101 is a better receiver then the SX-96, or SX-100.  The
SX-101 sold new for over $100.00 more than the SX-100.  The final
model, the SX-101A has a product detector, and selectable sideband.

73, Bruce WA8TNC
=======================
Misic, George J. wrote: