[Hallicrafters] Re:Hallicrafters boat anchors as Dx machines

[Bill Krause]

Dan,
          That's a strong endorsement. I have never been serious about 
BCB Dxing, maybe it's time I think about it. Any particular antenna you 
recommend for the 71 for BCB??

                                                          Bill

DAN COTSIRILOS wrote:

>Having owned both the SX-42 is about the same as the 62, maybe the 62 is a
>little better? The sx-100 has the edge with the product detector, I am not
>sure but I don't think the 100 has 3 IF's. I have yet to find a radio that
>out-performs my 71 on BCB. A few equals (Collins etc) but none better!
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bill Krause" <bkrause at sos.net>
>To: "HALLICRAFTERS" <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 12:08 AM
>Subject: [Hallicrafters] Hallicrafters boat anchors as Dx machines
>
>
>  
>
>>I think it may have been established by Phil and others that the SX-71
>>may be superior to the SX 62 as a DX machine where as the SX 62 maybe
>>works for the SWL. How do the SX 42 and SX 100 fit into things as DX
>>machines, particularly sas comparred to the SX-71
>>
>>                                                       Bill Krause
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF **for assistance**
>>dfischer at usol.com
>>----
>>Hallicrafters Collectors International: http://www.w9wze.org
>>----
>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---