[Hallicrafters] 5 MHZ

[Cliff Bond]

I hope they are not planning on using military Special Ops units to enforce
5 mHz ham-interferrence.

On second-thought, I think I'll just monitor too...  my bunker isn't deep
enough to withstand a smart-bomb.

HaHa....

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <nv4t at bellsouth.net>

> There are trained cw ops in the military---but they're all special ops
these days, so ya ain't gonna hear about them!!
> >
> > From: "Duane Fischer, W8DBF" <dfischer at usol.com>
> > Date: 2003/06/19 Thu PM 09:57:43 EDT
> > To: "Cliff Bond" <WA4MWM at triad.rr.com>,
> > "Rich Oliver" <Rich.Oliver at lowell.edu>,
> > <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
> > CC: <Rich.Oliver at lowell.edu>,  <w5htw at att.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] 5 MHZ
> >
> > Well Mil dudes, be it true?
> >
> >
> > ----------
> > From: Cliff Bond <WA4MWM at triad.rr.com>
> > To: Rich Oliver <Rich.Oliver at lowell.edu>; hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
> > Cc: Rich.Oliver at lowell.edu; w5htw at att.net
> > Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] 5 MHZ
> > Date: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:48 PM
> >
> > The reason I have been told operation is limited to USB (i.e. no CW)
is...
> >
> > This is a shared-frequency with the military.  The military no longer
has
> > CW-capable operators.  Therefore, for identification purposes, users of
the
> > frequencies must use modes the military can copy.
> >
> > (I think I also read this in some information from the Commission.)
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Rich Oliver" <Rich.Oliver at lowell.edu>
> > To: <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>
> > Cc: <Rich.Oliver at lowell.edu>; <w5htw at att.net>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 7:23 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] 5 MHZ
> >
> >
> > > I shouldn't have any trouble getting on 60 M with my trusty TR-7 and
> > > Hertz antenna, but I think I'll lurk with the rest of you for now
> > > anyway.  The 50 Watt restriction doesn't bother me; I have never felt
> > > the need to run QRO.  What does bother me is that only USB is allowed.
> > >  If it were possible to run CW we could accommodate many more users.
> > >  For those benighted individuals who think CW is useless because
*they*
> > > never use it, a couple of those frequencies could still be reserved
for
> > > USB so they don't have to endure A1.  Sadly such a change probably
makes
> > > too much sense to receive serious consideration, but just stop and
think
> > > how sweet 30 M is without the voice modes!  Anyway, I really wonder
what
> > > you can do with 50 W on 60 M that you couldn't do at least as well on
40
> > > or 80.
> > >
> > > 73, Rich, KC9GQ
> > >
> > > w5htw at att.net wrote:
> > >
> > > >I think a lot of us are going to be "lurkers" - listeners only, on 5
MHZ.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF **for assistance**
> > > dfischer at usol.com
> > > ----
> > > Hallicrafters Collectors International: http://www.w9wze.org
> > > ----
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF **for assistance**
> > dfischer at usol.com
> > ----
> > Hallicrafters Collectors International: http://www.w9wze.org
> > ----
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> > _______________________________________________
> > List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF **for assistance**
> > dfischer at usol.com
> > ----
> > Hallicrafters Collectors International: http://www.w9wze.org
> > ----
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF **for assistance**
> dfischer at usol.com
> ----
> Hallicrafters Collectors International: http://www.w9wze.org
> ----
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters