[Hallicrafters] SX-101A Glass

[Ken Kinyon - W7TS]

Hi Dave,
No I didn't think of non glare glass.  I think it would look strange with
it.  Since the dial is back lit, it might not help much and since the
original was not non glare, I believe regular glass is more appropriate.
You did get my curiosity up however.  I wonder what it would look like.
73, Ken W7TS

-------------------
Kenneth E.  Kinyon
34 Princeton Circle
Longmont, CO 80503-2106
Voice: (303) 684-0037
Fax:  (303) 776-5088
E-mail: W7TS at attbi.com
	  W7TS at qsl.net
	  W7TS at arrl.net
ALPCA #8339
ARRL-LM
-------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: hallicrafters-admin at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:hallicrafters-admin at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Dave Moorman
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 07:20
To: Hallicrafters/qth.net
Subject: Re: [Hallicrafters] SX-101A PARTS


on 1/2/03 4:07 PM, Ken Kinyon - W7TS at w7ts at attbi.com wrote:

> Hi Dan,
> I have not removed the panel on my SX-101A to see the glass mounting, but
i
> assume it is similar to my SX-62A.  It arrived with a cracked glass front
> cover.  I took the pieces to a glass shop and they cut a piece of picture
> frame glass that is identical to the original and only cost about $3.50.
> 73,
> Ken W7TS

Ken -

Did you specify non-glare glass?  I have to replace that glass panel, too,
and wondered if non-glare glass would make it easier to read the dial.

Dave

_______________________________________________
List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF **for assistance**
dfischer at usol.com
----
Hallicrafters Collectors International: http://www.w9wze.org
----
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters