[Hallicrafters] SX-88 Question Update
GARDGORE at aol.com
GARDGORE at aol.com
Tue Jul 9 22:43:02 EDT 2002
I have more info on that cap now. It is a bypass cap on the sensitivity and
monitor controls that varies the bias for the RF and IF amplifiers. The
schematic calls for 10 mfd and my receiver has 250 mfd apparently factory
installed. I am told that it is somewhat non critical and that there is less
than 50 volts in this circuit but I was concerned about such a wide
disparity. Since I want to replace it as well I wanted to ask those of you
experienced in circuit design how the different values (especially the wide
spread in these two) would perform in this circuit? Did the factory make a
production line change to the larger value for C-120 for a reason? Was there
an incentive for them to change to a larger value than that originally
specified when the manual was printed? What would be their reasoning behind
this change?
Thanks, Greg
In a message dated 7/8/2002 8:50:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GARDGORE at aol.com writes:
> I am in the process of recapping an SX-88 and have hit a snag. The schematic
>
> calls for C-120 to be 10 mfd @ 150 volts and the cap in my receiver is 250
> mfd @ 50 volts. All caps are the originals and the lead dress and solder
> work
> is all untouched and original. Others have said Hallicrafters often made
> changes in the specifications after the manuals were printed and many times
>
> receivers have surfaced that didn't match the schematic. What would be the
> effect on the circuits performance with the two different values? I wonder
> what drove the change? What would you recommend for C-120?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Greg Gore; WA1KBQ
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
Please post in Plain-Text only.---
More information about the Hallicrafters
mailing list