FW: [Hallicrafters] Mail List Changes

[Ralph Howes]

Bob:
That's what I've been saying. That's also why the tabs are marked "Reply"
and "Reply All", I think. Well maybe with time and some kind words the rest
of the reflectors will change as the Kenwood reflector has.
Best regards,
Ralph Howes
W8BVH

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Nickels" <ranickel at mwci.net>
To: <hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net>; ""Alan L. Waller"" <k3tkj at qsl.net>
Cc: "hammarlund-qth" <hammarlund at mailman.qth.net>; "balist-qth"
<boatanchors at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: January 14, 2002 09:20 PM
Subject: Re: FW: [Hallicrafters] Mail List Changes


> I agree with Al.  Most mailers provide easy options for "Reply to All"
(i.e the
> reflector) and  "Reply to Sender" when a private response is intended.
Many
> times a comment on a reflector will prompt me to respond on a totally
different
> subject, or perhaps to make a personal comment that would be off-topic for
the
> list and a waste of bandwidth and reflector resources (i.e every message
gets
> archived).  Plus,  price negotiations and personal questions or comments
do not
> belong on the reflector and every time I've seen a list set up without
this
> flexibility, frustration and embarassment ensue when the inevitable lapse
occurs.
>
> The qth.net lists are a great asset, and to make the best use of resources
and to
> accomodate the habits we've learned from other mail lists, I'd like to see
both
> options supported.   I think we all can determine which one is appropriate
to use
> when we post.
>
> 73, Bob W9RAN
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hallicrafters mailing list
> Hallicrafters at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/hallicrafters
>
>