To sidestep the printer resolution, maybe do a silicon mold of the drum, cast a wax (etc.) copy & then use that for a lost wax casting in metal. Or is that double casting process prone to losing fidelity?

Wayne
WB4OGM

On Saturday, August 17, 2024 at 08:46:35 PM MDT, Jones, Douglas W via GreenKeys <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Tomas Larsson [[email protected]] -- Saturday, August 17, 2024 4:18 PM

> Is there anyone out there that has an un-used printer drum for an Model 33.
> The Idea is to scan it and print  it, and the cast in Aluminum or something similar.

I think aluminum would be too soft, but the lost-wax process can be used for much harder metals.  Aluminum bronze comes to mind.

I have no new type drum from a 33, but I can spare a used one if I can get it back.

The resolution of your printing really will matter.  Filament deposition printers rarely have a resolution of 1/10 mm, and I suspect you wat 1/100 mm or even better.  I know that there are scanners and 3D printers with that resolution.  I have a friend who is a jeweler here in Iowa City who has such printers -- used to do masters for lost-wax casting of gold and silver jewelry.

          Doug Jones

______________________________________________________________
GreenKeys mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

>>> Jordan Spencer Cunningham's GreenKeys Search Tool: https://teletype.net/gksearch
>>> 2002-to-present greenkeys archive: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/
>>> 1998-to-2001 greenkeys archive: http://mailman.qth.net/archive/greenkeys/greenkeys.html
>>> Randy Guttery's 2001-to-2009 GreenKeys Search Tool: http://comcents.com/tty/greenkeyssearch.html

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]