[GreenKeys] Military RATT mark high/low change

[W2HX]

> at some point as the military moved from FSK to USB AFSK they shifted from 2500Hz tone center to 2000Hz center. I’m guessing probably because 2925 was getting knocked down by the voice passband filtering?

That most almost certainly has to be the reason.

As for the other question it is a mystery.

From: greenkeys-bounces at mailman.qth.net <greenkeys-bounces at mailman.qth.net> On Behalf Of Nick England
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 7:47 AM
To: harold at w6iwi.org
Cc: greenkeys at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [GreenKeys] Military RATT mark high/low change

I have read how ham RTTY evolved based on the simple LSMFT technique for FSK, tones for VHF AM, and then LSB operation.

But my question is focused on military/commercial practice, initially FSK shifted up/down from a center freq. Post-WW2, the military converted existing CW (and on-off RATT) transmitters to true FSK with add-on converters. New transmitters also used the same scheme, a master oscillator followed by a 200kc section that shifted up-down from that center. Operation was evidently mark-high.

So why the later change to mark-low?? What possible benefits offset the disruption to existing networks?

Yes military gear is often USB only. But that’s no reason to change to mark-low. It is just a simple matter of choosing the right tone pair for the AFSK keyer. What’s the big deal? Surely it wasn’t because the military just copied TU plans from RTTY Journal?

Nick, still mystified.

p.s. at some point as the military moved from FSK to USB AFSK they shifted from 2500Hz tone center to 2000Hz center. I’m guessing probably because 2925 was getting knocked down by the voice passband filtering?

On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 8:52 PM Harold Hallikainen via GreenKeys <greenkeys at mailman.qth.net<mailto:greenkeys at mailman.qth.net>> wrote:


On Sun, November 20, 2022 3:52 pm, Nick England wrote:
> Evidently, earlier military HF radioteletype (RATT) transmitters were
> designed to produce mark high. Later military gear produces mark low. When
> and why did this change occur? It is a puzzlement to me that anyone would
> have created such confusion on purpose. Nets would have been a nightmare.
> Note- I am talking about the RF frequency being low or high.
> Cheers
> Nick
> --

Interesting question. Back in the 1960s, I learned LSMFT (low space makes
fine teletype). Back then, we would FSK the transmitter directly shifting
the frequency low for space. We received with an LSB receiver so space was
the high tone. I think a lot of commerical and military equipment only
runs USB, so with audio space high, space ended up high on RF. Note, for
example, the SEA 245 ( https://w6iwi.org/SEA245/SEA_245.pdf ) that I use.
In normal maritime mode, it only supports USB. It does have an amateur
mode that adds LSB.

That is my GUESS, but I would be interested in hearing the actual history.

Harold
https://w6iwi.org

______________________________________________________________
GreenKeys mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net<mailto:GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net>

>>> Jordan Spencer Cunningham's GreenKeys Search Tool: https://teletype.net/gksearch
>>> 2002-to-present greenkeys archive: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/
>>> 1998-to-2001 greenkeys archive: http://mailman.qth.net/archive/greenkeys/greenkeys.html
>>> Randy Guttery's 2001-to-2009 GreenKeys Search Tool: http://comcents.com/tty/greenkeyssearch.html

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to navy.radio at gmail.com<mailto:navy.radio at gmail.com>
--
Nick England K4NYW
www.navy-radio.com<http://www.navy-radio.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/attachments/20221121/67a1787f/attachment.html>