[GreenKeys] TU-170 with External Loop Supply

John, W9DDD w9ddd at tapr.org
Mon Aug 16 08:03:49 EDT 2021


Well I remembered to look, but I couldn't remember where!

In the meantime here's a snippet from a poor scan that appears on 
ElektroTanya.com.  Actually in terms of showing the ground connection 
for the transformer's CTs, it's a better scan.

You'll notice that R74 is present instead of the fuse, indicating this 
is from an earlier kit.

---
----
The above comments or recommendations are SWAG. Use at your own risk.
John, W9DDD

On 8/16/2021 4:48 AM, John W9DDD wrote:
> I think the center tap to ground symbol connection has suffered the 
> same fate as the connection between R60 and M.  I will go fetch my 
> hard copy later (if I remember) and see if it's any clearer.  Some 
> times a faint line will disappear in scan.
>
> John, W9DDD
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2021, at 3:37 AM, Paul Birkel <pbirkel at gmail.com 
> <mailto:pbirkel at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Daniel: [U] (TIP) now being disconnected (fuse removed) the wire-pair 
>> would be between [R] and what?  [R] would be TIP?  I’m not yet 
>> envisioning the revised circuit and how it would work with an 
>> external supply.
>>
>> (The published schematic for the TU-170 itself appears to be in error 
>> as the center-tap on the secondary of T1 and T2  isn’t indicated as 
>> being connected to chassis GND.)
>>
>> *From:*Daniel Jones [mailto:djones at k6yic.com]
>> *Sent:* Sunday, August 15, 2021 10:56 AM
>> *To:* John W9DDD
>> *Cc:* Paul Birkel; Greenkeys
>> *Subject:* Re: [GreenKeys] TTY loop jack boxes - SET, LPG, MISC
>>
>> I forgot to mention that I did remove C40 which couples the collector 
>> to chassis ground.
>>
>> I removed the loop jack on the back and run a pair of wires in its 
>> place without C40.
>>
>> (Side note if you have an older version only the TU-170 you might not 
>> have a loop fuse but a resistor in its place (R74), this would need 
>> to be removed to accomplish the same thing. I have both types).
>>
>> I have mine patched into my 1203a panel using a Navy PP-3494A/UG loop 
>> supply to make everything work.
>>
>> Also as a note I don’t believe that the meter will work or the 
>> current adjustments will be functional if you don’t have an external 
>> supply.  It’s not necessary but diminishes the cool factor a bit in 
>> my opinion.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 15, 2021, at 07:26, John W9DDD <w9ddd at tapr.org 
>> <mailto:w9ddd at tapr.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>
>>     How are you handling the fact that the emitter of the switching
>>     transistor of the TU-170 is pretty much at circuit common.
>>
>>     John, W9DDD
>>
>>
>>     On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:43 AM, Daniel Jones <djones at k6yic.com
>>     <mailto:djones at k6yic.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Nick pretty much explained it but I will mention that I use a
>>         TU-170 connected to my 1203 but I utilize an external loop
>>         supply.
>>
>>         I just pulled the loop fuse on the TU-170 and it now just
>>         utilizes the same external power supply that my other
>>         Terminal units require (CV-2460 adn CV-483).  It has been
>>         operating fine forte last 5 or so months being on all
>>         weekend.  The nice thing about the 1203 is the fact you can
>>         adjust the loop current for each channel.
>>
>>         My 2 cents….
>>
>>         Daniel Jones (K6YIC)
>>         DJones at k6yic.com <mailto:DJones at k6yic.com>
>>         http://K6YIC.com
>>
>>         HH Phone #11973
>>
>>
>>
>>         <logo-globe-600dpi.jpg>
>>
>>
>>
>>         On Aug 15, 2021, at 3:21 AM, Paul Birkel <pbirkel at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:pbirkel at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         So … I’m still not the “sharpest crayon in the box” on this
>>         topic.  Let me use the SB-1203/UG as my example (documented
>>         online at:https://www.navy-radio.com/rtty/sb1203.htm). It has
>>         six identical circuits (“channels”) – one example diagrammed
>>         at: https://www.navy-radio.com/rtty/patch/1203a-man-07.JPG
>>
>>         Inside the unit there are several sets of terminal strips
>>         (see:https://www.navy-radio.com/rtty/patch/1203a-man-01.JPG)
>>         establishing pairs of permanent connections corresponding to
>>         the TB-* appearing at the bottom of the example schematic
>>         diagram.
>>
>>         TB-101 would normally connect to some equipment  (this is, I
>>         think, “(LINE LPG)” in the terminal strip diagram) that is
>>         _/always/_ in that particular channel (examples from that
>>         terminal strip diagram are “RADIO ADAPTERS, FREQUENCY SHIFT
>>         KEYERS, LINE MODULATORS”), and may optionally supply
>>         loop-current, correct?
>>
>>         Alternatively TB-101 could be strapped closed under the
>>         assumption that there is a SET connected to TB-102 and there
>>         is a loop-supply established via TB-104 and the default
>>         strapping?
>>
>>         The distinction between TB-101 and TB-102 seems to be whether
>>         the SET supplies loop-current or not, correct?
>>
>>         TB-102 (SET jack) would connect to some equipment that is
>>         normally in that channel, but can be either:
>>
>>         (1) removed from that channel by inserting some sort of
>>         “dummy” plug (has no internal wiring)? … or
>>
>>         (2) removed from that channel and connected into some other
>>         channel using a patch cord
>>
>>         that establishes a connection between two plugs where the
>>         second plug is then inserted into
>>
>>         a LPG jack on another channel?
>>
>>         TB-103 (MISC jack) would connect some equipment that is not
>>         in any channel, to some channel using a patch cord  to a LPG
>>         jack?
>>
>>         (The documentation for this unit is quite good; my comments
>>         above attempt to summarize my functional understanding of how
>>         it is intended to be employed as an exemplar of what I assume
>>         is a pretty standard approach to loop jack boxes.)
>>
>>         Is “patch cord” the correct terminology?  Is it just wired
>>         tip-to-tip and ring-to-ring (or shell-to-shell if two-wire)? 
>>         Are they normally TRS (shell left unconnected?) or TS?
>>
>>         Now, for a use-case, if my source were a self-powered loop
>>         from a Flesher TU-170 (which incorporates a loop supply and
>>         0.125A fuse) it seems to me that I’d:
>>
>>         1.Strap the SB-1203/UG for REMOTE internally (rather than use
>>         the default strapping for a TB-104-connected loop supply).
>>
>>         2.Connect the TU-170 to TB-101.
>>
>>         3.Connect a (for example) M15 to TB-102 (SET jack).
>>
>>         4.Connect a (for example) M14 ROTR to TB-103 (MISC jack).
>>
>>         5.Connect a (for example) M14 TD to a different TB-103 (some
>>         other MISC jack)
>>
>>         6.Optionally add a loop-cable from MISC to an JPG jack to use
>>         the M14 ROTR to generate a paper tape of traffic between the
>>         TU-170 and M15.
>>
>>         7.Optionally add a loop-cable from other-MISC to an JPG jack
>>         to use the M14 TD to read a paper tape “into” traffic between
>>         the TU-170 and M15.
>>
>>         8.Optionally add a loop-cable from SET to an JPG jack in some
>>         _/other/_ channel to move the M15 to that other channel
>>         (which would need to have at least loop supply established).
>>
>>         Would this be a reasonable approach? Would it be a _/good/_
>>         approach if these were the four items to be co-employed in
>>         this use-case :->?
>>
>>         Would it, in fact, be better to treat the M14 TD as a SET in
>>         a different (powered) loop in which case I could then either:
>>
>>         A.cross-connect the M15 there, or
>>
>>         B.cross-connect the M14 ROTR there, or
>>
>>         C.cross-connect the M14 TD into the TU-170 loop?
>>
>>         This seems like a more flexible approach assuming that there
>>         is available a separate loop supply for the second loop.
>>
>>         Am I thinking about all of this “right”?  Inquiring minds
>>         want to know!
>>
>>         Thank you,
>>
>>         paul
>>
>>         (A long message, but I’ve not gleaned enough specificity from
>>         GK traffic archives.  Hopefully by being pedantic here …
>>         we’ll avoid more “dull crayons” in the future :->)
>>
>>         *From:*greenkeys-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>>         <mailto:greenkeys-bounces at mailman.qth.net>[mailto:greenkeys-bounces at mailman.qth.net]*On
>>         Behalf Of*Nick England
>>         *Sent:*Sunday, August 08, 2021 3:33 PM
>>         *To:*Greenkeys
>>         *Subject:*[GreenKeys] Fwd: TTY loop jack boxes - eBay
>>
>>         Argghh - I forgot to include the link to my page with
>>         schematic and explanation
>>
>>         https://www.navy-radio.com/rtty-patch.htm
>>
>>         In the schematic for this type of box, you will see that the
>>         LPG jacks are shorted when nothing is plugged in. When
>>         nothing is plugged into the SET jack, theassociated
>>         equipmentis in the loop. When you plug a cable into into the
>>         SET jack, the equipment is taken out of the loop onto the
>>         cable and the loop is shorted. This is so you can plug the
>>         equipment normally in Loop 1 into Loop 2 for example and
>>         vice-versa (jumper SET-1 to LPG-2 and jumper SET-2 to LPG-1).
>>
>>         */"NOTE: Anyone patching or unpatching circuits from a TTY
>>         panel must be sure to pull the plug from the looping jack
>>         (LPG) before removing the other plug from the SET (machine)
>>         jack.Pulling the SET jack first interrupts all TTY message
>>         traffic on that channel. IT ALSO PRODUCES A DANGEROUS DC
>>         VOLTAGE ON THE EXPOSED PLUG!"/*
>>
>>         Nick England K4NYW
>>         www.navy-radio.com <http://www.navy-radio.com/>
>>
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> GreenKeys mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net
>
>>>> Jordan Spencer Cunningham's GreenKeys Search Tool: https://teletype.net/gksearch
>>>> 2002-to-present greenkeys archive: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/
>>>> 1998-to-2001 greenkeys archive: http://mailman.qth.net/archive/greenkeys/greenkeys.html
>>>> Randy Guttery's 2001-to-2009 GreenKeys Search Tool: http://comcents.com/tty/greenkeyssearch.html
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to w9ddd at tapr.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/attachments/20210816/ecfe3912/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: icedcnphbddfhbef.png
Type: image/png
Size: 55527 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/attachments/20210816/ecfe3912/attachment.png>


More information about the GreenKeys mailing list