[GreenKeys] Two-tape TTY for crypto
Ralph Irish
w8roi at wowway.com
Tue Oct 13 09:33:38 EDT 2020
Dave
The others covered most of the topic for the PYTHON system.
I used one for about 18 months while I was in the Navy. It consisted of two
Model 14 TDs, one of which basically had no controls other than a 'tight tape
switch. It was 'pulsed' by the main system when the device was in either
ENCRYPT or DECRYPT, with something or someone making the 'ordinary'
TD operate. It was interchangeable with the other 14 TDs in the radio room.
This special TD had a much different serializing plate under the cover. The
regular TDs had a single copper 'ring' interrupted in several places to represent
the various parts of an RTTY character. The special TD had this second ring
to do the 'logic math' to combine the various 'bits' of a character to form the
'processed' character bit, etc.
This second ring did not 'do the math', but was part of the system that did.
The center ring was 'common', and I think that the outer ring was the 'normal'
one similar or identical to the other TD. The center ring was involved in the
code/decode function somehow.
- - - -
There was a five character 'key indicator' that we watched for. We had only one
of them in the crypto area. These were spooled on red plastic reels, quite similar
to 16mm film reels, about 6 or 7 inches in diameter. There was a 'spindle' that
held the spool to feed this tape into the 'irregular' TD. Each segment was probably
1000 characters long and there was a 'master number' for the large spools, and each
one had a number every so many characters with a black line across the tape at
position "Ø" This was the start point for decoding things.
The incoming tape had a 'header' with some address info, a Date Time Group
and date, and somewhere after that were two blank characters. The next character
was position "Ø" for that. Once both tapes were in place the "GO" button (forgot
the real name of it!) could be pushed and the two TDs would start moving and as
has been said several times there was some internal relay logic that took the 'bits'
and combined them to decide whether that particular location was a Mark or a SPACE
or a 1 or a Ø, etc.
As long as the 'random tape' was indeed random, the text would be quite safe. In
the late 50s and into the early 60s, there were not too many computers fast enough to
determine the 'randomness' of a code tape, so things were considered safe enough for
Top Secret items.
On the few occasions we discovered that a message being decoded was Top Secret,
the system was stopped and anyone not cleared for T/S had to leave the area. If no
one was so cleared, a Comm Officer was summoned to complete the decoding. Much
the same for the KL-47 system in another room. I was also cleared for that equipment,
but when we were on a WesPac cruise, I had few duties that required me to enter that
space. In the states, I stood watches in the Main Communications room and when a
message came in for that system, I would go into the Crypto Center and decode it.
Again, if the opening phrase was "Top Secret", the system was stopped and someone
with the proper clearance would be summoned.
- - - -
The transition that occurred to make the classification the first word/words happened
when I was still in the Navy. Evidently, someone, somewhere sent out a classified
document 'in the clear' which caused 'heartburn' all over the world! So a decision was
made to prevent this from happening again. The word went out that for any message
going out on Fleet Broadcasts, the first word of it had to be the classification:
//UNCLASS// //CONFIDENTIAL// //SECRET// //TOP SECRET// If there
were more classifications, I never heard about them. Probably just as well!
Then there were the 'priorities' of Fleet Broadcast traffic:
Deferred
Routine
Priority
Operational Immediate
Emergency
FLASH
(I think I have these in the right order)
- - - -
It was a most interesting time of my life. those two-plus years in Navy communications.
covering voice, Morse, Teleprinter for the in and out things, and then the various types of encoding/decoding were just 'icing on the cake'!
Hope my descriptions are not too complicated. That is the way I seem to remember
things from back then.
73,
Ralph - W8ROI
- - - - - - - -
From: "Dave Horsfall" <dave at horsfall.org>
To: "Greenkeys" <greenkeys at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 3:05:41 PM
Subject: [GreenKeys] Two-tape TTY for crypto
I've been reading a bit of crypto stuff lately (one of my hobbies), and
something caught my eye; apparently Teletype made a box that took two
tapes: one was the plain/cipher text, and the other was the key, and the
two were combined with no-carry addition on the individual bits.
Anyone know any more about this?
-- Dave VK2KFU
______________________________________________________________
GreenKeys mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net
>>> Jordan Spencer Cunningham's GreenKeys Search Tool: https://teletype.net/gksearch
>>> 2002-to-present greenkeys archive: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/
>>> 1998-to-2001 greenkeys archive: http://mailman.qth.net/archive/greenkeys/greenkeys.html
>>> Randy Guttery's 2001-to-2009 GreenKeys Search Tool: http://comcents.com/tty/greenkeyssearch.html
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to w8roi at wowway.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/attachments/20201013/a42ae8b5/attachment.html>
More information about the GreenKeys
mailing list