[GreenKeys] period HF receivers
Bruce Gentry
ka2ivy at verizon.net
Thu May 11 11:02:59 EDT 2017
The late 1940s is a time that fascinates me, even though I was not
around until 1950. I think a lot of amatuer radio equipment styling and
design was driven by the need to make the items acceptable to home
decor, and gain consent from partners/spouses for the expendature. In
the case of a Hallicrafters SX-42 or perhaps SX-62, one partner
(usually the guy) wanted the rig for hobby or techie use, but the other
partner may have been concerned about financial priorities and resisted.
The conflict could have been reduced by the features, styling, fidelity,
and frequency coverage of the receiver. The fact a homemaker could use
the same receiver, especially if the good loudspeaker and a turntable
was with it, to listen to daytime entertainment broadcasts, records, and
the audio of low band VHF television stations probably swayed many of
them to accept it. I also have no doubt many women were resentful of
being forced out of the workforce as they were, and being able to
operate something they had learned to use or built during the war for
their pleasure made it easier for them to accept into the home budget.
The same experiences have also caused serious repercussions the other
way too, and I have no doubt it was behind so many surplus radios having
all their name tags removed and being repainted. I was given three
bushel baskets full of ARC-5 receivers in the 1960s because a fellow's
wife wanted "That old war stuff- out of my house!" . With regard to
Teletypes, I had never seen one operated in a workplace by a guy until I
was in the Air Force. This brings up a question. Was the finger and hand
size and reach of women considered in the design of Teletype keyboards,
especially the 28 and 32/33 ? The cabinet designs were also far sleeker
than the 15 and 19. I think in those tight gender role times the cabinet
design might have made the operators feel they were operating some jet
age or space age device and reduce their feelings of being "just a
secretary", at least until their boss growled for his coffee. Along
those lines, were female operators allowed or expected to change paper
and tape rolls and ribbons in Teletypes in 1950s/60s offices ?
Bruce Gentry, KA2IVY
On 5/9/17 3:21 PM, Pete Lancashire wrote:
> Have not done it yet but I'm going to put one of the Teletypes in the
> living room. A TU and a HF receiver, something like the
> HallicraftersSX-42 with its industrial design by Henry Dreyfus since
> it is the living room.
>
> Since there is pretty much zip on HF now days, build a little mW
> transmitter and FSK it from something off the internet.
>
> -pete
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Richard Knoppow
> <1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com <mailto:1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com>> wrote:
>
> I have a kit for my R-388 but have never had time to install
> it. They have an excellent reputation. My receiver has the PD and
> AVC mods that were earlier. The PD works OK but the AVC is awful.
> I want to ask the fellow who designed the Treetop circuit about
> some sort of noise limiter that would be suitable for use with it.
>
> On 5/8/2017 12:28 PM, Jeffrey D Angus wrote:
>
> On 5/8/2017 2:14 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote:
>
> Also do not forget the Collins 51J series, these are very fine
> receivers. The 51J-4 has mechanical filters in it so is
> considerably
> more expensive than the earlier versions but the earlier
> ones can
> be used with an external SSB or RTTY adaptor which will supply
> the selectivity.
>
> I have a 51J-3. What makes the difference is have the product
> detector kit installed from Tree Top Circuits.
> <http://www.ebay.com/itm/222493257886
> <http://www.ebay.com/itm/222493257886>>
> They also have the kit for the R-390/390A
> <http://www.ebay.com/itm/222493260192
> <http://www.ebay.com/itm/222493260192>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Richard Knoppow
> 1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com <mailto:1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com>
> WB6KBL
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> GreenKeys mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
> <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> <http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>
> Post: mailto:GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net
> <mailto:GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net>
>
> 2002-to-present greenkeys archive:
> http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/
> <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/>
> 1998-to-2001 greenkeys archive:
> http://mailman.qth.net/archive/greenkeys/greenkeys.html
> <http://mailman.qth.net/archive/greenkeys/greenkeys.html>
> Randy Guttery's 2001-to-2009 GreenKeys Search Tool:
> http://comcents.com/tty/greenkeyssearch.html
> <http://comcents.com/tty/greenkeyssearch.html>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> GreenKeys mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net
>
> 2002-to-present greenkeys archive: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/
> 1998-to-2001 greenkeys archive: http://mailman.qth.net/archive/greenkeys/greenkeys.html
> Randy Guttery's 2001-to-2009 GreenKeys Search Tool: http://comcents.com/tty/greenkeyssearch.html
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/attachments/20170511/ebb29cbe/attachment.html>
More information about the GreenKeys
mailing list