[GreenKeys] Fwd: Re: slightly off topic
COURYHOUSE at aol.com
COURYHOUSE at aol.com
Mon May 2 06:01:55 EDT 2016
I liked grt 3s a dn grc 27s did not like gra 53's although we are
looking for a gra 53 for the collection here at SMECC since we used
them at Luke. crammed one with a dynamotor in the wing commander's car
and we have several around base and at the touch and go scoring trailers
on the flightline.
Jim H gave SMECC a single channel UHF recv. that was the companion
to the Grt3
odd thing even in the 70's luke afb still had bc 640 and bc 639 for
vhf tower an vhf comm and had arc 3s for backups!
I need some green bc 640 tx and bc 639 rx ( have a gray navy 639
wanna trade Nick? we need the green one!)
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 5/1/2016 11:46:55 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
greenkeys at mailman.qth.net writes:
Well, what I mainly remember about them was that the first time I went on
active duty (also in SEA), I was an ET. OE Division's leading Chief (the
only E8 aboard - and one of the first Chiefs to make Senior Chief) usually
assigned new hands to nursemaid the 94 R-390A's we had aboard. After a
while, and if you did OK, you generally got assigned to more interesting sets.
If you screwed up, you either got sent to the Mess Decks or assigned to
the GRC-27. :-) I never actually had to work on it.
I never understood why we had one, anyway. We had 25 or 30 TED/RED's and
several AN/GRC-9's and SRC-21's.
In a message dated 05/01/2016 23:52:06 PM Central Daylight Time,
ka2ivy at verizon.net writes:
YES! I installed, moved, and repaired them at all hours of the day and
night for 15 fun filled months in southeast Asia 1970-71.
On 5/2/16 12:37 AM, WA5CAB--- via GreenKeys wrote:
Yahbut, the sucker weighs 600 pounds bone dry. Have you ever worked on
one of them?
In a message dated 05/01/2016 23:07:56 PM Central Daylight Time,
_ka2ivy at verizon.net_ (mailto:ka2ivy at verizon.net) writes:
The GRC-27, ARC-27, PRC-41, and GRA-53 all will work down to 220 mc
unmodified, although sensitivety and power output decrease. They can be regained
by adjusting the trimmer condensors, but performance at the upper
frequencies of no use to hams will be seriously degraded. It is a viable rig for
ham use, and unless the regulations have changed, it would be great for
AFSK Teletype.
Bruce Gentry, KA2IVY
On 5/1/16 11:51 PM, _WA5CAB at cs.com_ (mailto:WA5CAB at cs.com) wrote:
AN/GRC-27 was a decent rig in its day for what it was used for. But it
isn't legal for US hams to talk to US military aircraft. It covers 225-400
MC AM.and MCW.
Robert & Susan Downs - Houston
wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
MVPA 9480
______________________________________________________________
GreenKeys mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net
2002-to-present greenkeys archive:
http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/
1998-to-2001 greenkeys archive:
http://mailman.qth.net/archive/greenkeys/greenkeys.html
Randy Guttery's 2001-to-2009 GreenKeys Search Tool:
http://comcents.com/tty/greenkeyssearch.html
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to couryhouse.smecc at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/attachments/20160502/74f11190/attachment.html>
More information about the GreenKeys
mailing list