[GreenKeys] Ruined? You decide....

[drlegendre .]

"I'm curious about what you mean by weak."


On my particular video display, the photo was somewhat out of focus, washed
out / overexposed and suffered from other defects, such as flares. When I
said 'weak', I meant that it was weak evidence for the actual appearance of
things - just a bad photo.

You can still see the lead dress and so on, but there's no fine detail.



On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Jeffrey D Angus <jdangus at att.net> wrote:

> On 7/30/2016 7:59 PM, drlegendre . wrote:
>
>> Incidentally.. while the under-chassis photo is a bit weak, the install of
>> the new boards appears to be quite workmanlike, and the general state
>> of lead dress is quite tidy.
>>
> I'm curious about what you mean by weak.
> But thanks for the compliment on quality.
> The Drake AC-4, and a Heathkit HP-23 came in for repair last week. Both
> went out on Thursday.
>
>> Much, much worse could have been done, here.
>> I'd not fault the previous owner or tech.
>>
> I'd have to agree with WA5CAB. I've seen some real nightmares come in
> to the shop with "Can you fix this?"
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff-1.0
> wa6fwi
> http://www.foxsmercantile.com
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> GreenKeys mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:GreenKeys at mailman.qth.net
>
> 2002-to-present greenkeys archive:
> http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/
> 1998-to-2001 greenkeys archive:
> http://mailman.qth.net/archive/greenkeys/greenkeys.html
> Randy Guttery's 2001-to-2009 GreenKeys Search Tool:
> http://comcents.com/tty/greenkeyssearch.html
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to drlegendre at gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/greenkeys/attachments/20160731/1c9eb1c7/attachment.html>