[GreenKeys] ZCZC and NNNN

Sheldon Daitch [email protected]
Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:44:43 -0500


Gil,

Your guess on ZCZC is as good as anything else, I suppose.
I like the limbering up!

Your end-of-message sequence intrigued me, so I am now
on a search for an old copy of our TTY instructions to 
see if we also included 10 LFs.  That was a good measure,
to move the end of the message up above the paper cutter.
I just can't remember what we did, as it was only too 
many years back for me.  

In looking over our old 1993 practices, I just realized 
something that I guess I missed over the years.  When
we left the M-28/Extel systems, and moved our official
traffic over to e-mail, our formatting favored the old
FAXFAX traffic format, and made the DTG NNNN sequence 
as an end of message indicator somewhat obsolete, but
optional for the field stations.  But we continued to
use the word REGARDS as an end of message indicator,
even tho, from a machine perspective, it did nothing.

73
Sheldon
WA4MZZ



"Richard M. Gillingham" wrote:
> 
> FAA used ZCZC as part of the 'conditioning' at the beginning of traffic.
> AFTN (an ICAO aviation net) also used this.  The ZCZC opened up a circuit,
> and further coding (KMIAYFYF for instance) opened either a punch or printer
> to receive traffic, and the NNNN deselected it.  Why the choice of ZCZC?  I
> dunno.  It's already been pointed out that Z and C alternate bits like RY
> does.  Just to limber up the machines??
> 
> Our end of message was LTRS CR CR (10) LF NNNN
> This advanced the paper so the traffic could be torn off immediately for
> distribution..  We used 2 part ncr paper for a record copy which rolled up
> on a paper winder.  We saved for the traffic for15 days and discarded it..
> 
> It's been a while, so I can't remember what was explained to us as to the
> why.
> 
> Gil, W1RG
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sheldon Daitch" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 4:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [GreenKeys] ZCZC and NNNN
> 
> > Jim,
> >
> > If I might add.
> >
> > ZCZC and NNNN should not occur in any typical text and
> > would not show up as false letter patterns.
> >
> > In our old torn-tape days, we used NNNN as the end of
> > message letter grouping, but I'd suppose that the
> > M-28 stunt box could have equally been coded for any
> > other letter group.  Seems to me, tho, that the
> > reperfs were set to actually stop on three Ns, but the
> > 4th N was sent in the message, to insure 3 sequential
> > Ns were received (at least on HF RTTY).
> >
> > When we ran the HF RTTY for VOA traffic, we used
> > FAXFAX to start the tape punch and NNNN to end a
> > tape (adjusted as I mentioned above).  The ZCZC is
> > more a military function, I think.
> >
> > Of course, today, FAX is a usual abbreviation for
> > facsimile, so we might have TTY problems today!
> >
> > 73
> > Sheldon
> > WA4MZZ
> >
> >
> > [email protected] wrote:
> > >
> > > Well I know this much.  They were used in Western Union's Plan 55 system
> > > for the USAF, late 1950s.  Which suggests they were probably standards
> for
> > > the U.S. military as a whole in that time period.  ZCZC has the property
> > > that the bit patterns are exactly the opposite for the two characters,
> so
> > > it is unlikely to be generated falsely.  In some of the switching
> > > equipment it is linefeed-NNNN that is detected as the end of message
> > > signal, so NNNN occurring just anywhere isn't taken as the end of
> message.
> > >
> > > These signals are still used in military systems.  See ACP127(G) (which
> > > I found somewhere on the web, but I don't remember where.)
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > jhaynes at alumni dot uark dot edu
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > GreenKeys mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
> > _______________________________________________
> > GreenKeys mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GreenKeys mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys