[GreenKeys] greenkeys admin stuff
Byron Cannon
[email protected]
Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:31:07 -0800
Gil;
Tell me again why it is that we need a "MODORATOR". I thought
Greenkeys was a open format devoted to RTTY. What in the world could
be more moderate than that hi hi...
Byron Cannon said that !!
[email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: "gil smith" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:41 PM
Subject: [GreenKeys] greenkeys admin stuff
> Hi folks:
>
> Well, I had a greenkeys posting rejected last week, so I replied to the
> list-admin address to inquire as to the reason for such a thing happening.
> Turns out I had a bold format character or something in there, though the
> message was rejected for a "bad header." During the course of this short
> dialog, Tim and Al somehow hoodwinked me into assuming admin duties for
> greenkeys. That's what I get for asking too many questions (now picture
> Ralph Kramden: "I got a biiiigg mouth!"). Ha!
>
> Anyway, I'm now the guy that will get rejected messages and such to deal
> with. If you are the perpetrator of such a message, you will get a notice
> saying: "Your message to GreenKeys awaits moderator approval," or
something
> sterile like that. And that would be me -- the "moderator" (try it with a
> Schwarzenegger accent). I'll try to moderate daily.
>
> There were a couple of messages tonight that bounced since the posting
> address was different than the member's address on the list. If your
email
> address changes, we need to correct it. Stuff like that. See, I'm
getting
> the hang of this already!
>
> gil
>
>
> ;-----------------------------------------------------------
> ; vaux electronics, inc. 480-354-5556
> ; http://www.vauxelectronics.com (fax: 480-354-5558)
> ;-----------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> GreenKeys mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys